Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.1367/2023

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Rajan Varghese et al regarding review of plaint rejection

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-19
Duration
approximately-1 year 20 days
Case Code No.
1367
Case Closed
Thu, 06/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited filed a review petition against the rejection of their plaint for recovery of an amount due. The defendants, Rajan Varghese and Alan Monsy, did not appear for the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The review petition was rejected as the plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee within the prescribed time. The court exercised its power to reject the petition without allowing it.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The review petition was rejected as the plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee within the prescribed time. The court exercised its power to reject the petition without allowing it.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to remit the required court fee, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to remit the required court fee, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner in this case has not remitted the balance court fee to date, even though the plaint was rejected on 28.10.2023 and the review petition was filed on 28.11.2023.

Judgment Evidence:

Resultantly, by invoking the power under section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 4(1) of CPC, the petition is rejected. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vineeth.V.S
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o Viswambaran.R
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajan Varghese
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o Babu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alan Monsy
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o Moncy Mathew
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Jayakrishnan.D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Request for review of the rejection of the plaint.
Evidence:
Resultantly, by invoking the power under section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 4(1) of CPC, the petition is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The affidavit was filed in lieu of chief examination for adducing ex parte evidence.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of court fee
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Raveendran Pillai, Sobhana N.B vs M/s Kerala Housing Finance Limited, Uniikrishnan Nair regarding review of the execution petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sindhu.K vs Bindu Shijit et al regarding review of order
Court of Additional Munsiff-II
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between G.S. Chandrasekharan Nair vs Jose.F regarding review of a rejected plaint
Principal Munsiff's Court, Thiruvananthapuram
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Vinod Kumar et al vs Sainudeen regarding review petition
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between S Abdul Razzak vs C B Suraja Devi et al regarding Review of commission report
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Review Petition Defendant Won