Case Summary
Vinod Kumar, represented by his wife Archana Devi S.G, filed a review petition against Sainudeen. The court heard the matter and noted that both parties settled the issue, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed following a settlement between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pressed by the petitioner.
The petition was not pressed by the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not pressed by the petitioner.
The petition was not pressed by the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
The Petitioner’s counsel endorsed that the petition is not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vinod Kumar
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Archana Devi S.G
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainudeen
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.Vikraman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V.Dinesh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Rahul.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement