Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.998/2023

Case between G.S. Chandrasekharan Nair vs Jose.F regarding review of a rejected plaint

Court
Principal Munsiff's Court, Thiruvananthapuram
Judge
Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-28
Duration
Case Code No.
998
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

G.S. Chandrasekharan Nair is the plaintiff seeking to review a court order that rejected his plaint due to non-payment of balance court fees. Jose.F is the defendant opposing the petition for review.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the review petition seeking to restore the suit that was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the review petition seeking to restore the suit that was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not filed in the proper format and did not meet the necessary legal requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not filed in the proper format and did not meet the necessary legal requirements.
Supporting Evidence
The present petition does not mention any grounds sufficient to warrant a review of the order passed by this court. Furthermore, no grounds were raised by the petitioner that are material and analogous to those specified under Order 47, Rule 1 of the CPC.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The petition is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
G.S. Chandrasekharan Nair
Relation
S/o late G.Sankaranarayanan Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose.F
Relation
S/o Francis
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sabu.N.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought for restoration of the suit that was dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence, this Court is of the opinion that the petition is only liable to be dismissed for the above reasons and accordingly, I order so.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner requested to review the order rejecting the plaint and restore the suit.
Evidence:
In the result: The petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sindhu.K vs Bindu Shijit et al regarding review of order
Court of Additional Munsiff-II
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Rajan Varghese et al regarding review of plaint rejection
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Jacob John vs Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd regarding review of execution petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vinod Kumar et al vs Sainudeen regarding review petition
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Syamkumar vs Biju, Sanju regarding review petition for rejection of suit due to non-payment of court fee.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won