Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.899/2023

Case between Shambu vs Sebastian regarding restoration of applications I.A. No. 7641/2016 and I.A. No. 7642/2016

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-26
Duration
approximately-10 years 4 months 14 days
Case Code No.
899
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Shambu, seeks restoration of previously dismissed applications to set aside an ex parte decree. The respondent, Sebastian, argues the petition is time-barred and seeks dismissal based on prior non-representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition seeking restoration of I.A. Nos. 7641/2016 and 7642/2016 is dismissed as it was filed beyond the limitation period. No costs are awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restorative Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition seeking restoration of I.A. Nos. 7641/2016 and 7642/2016 is dismissed as it was filed beyond the limitation period. No costs are awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The petition is time-barred and the petitioner suppressed material facts.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition is time-barred and the petitioner suppressed material facts.
Supporting Evidence
The present petition has been filed well beyond the prescribed period of limitation and that the petitioner has suppressed material facts from the Court with the intent to secure an order through misrepresentation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the petition is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shambu
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sebastian
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S.L Simon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Nellimoodu Udayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Restoration of I.A. Nos. 7641/2016 and 7642/2016
Evidence:
the present petition has been filed well beyond the prescribed period of limitation and that the petitioner has suppressed material facts from the Court with the intent to secure an order through misrepresentation. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, I order so.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restorative Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 02/12/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Lekha A et al regarding petition dismissal
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Unknown Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Kunjumon.T regarding restoration of petitions
Principal Munsiff Court
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Vinod Kumar et al vs Sainudeen regarding review petition
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Soumya.C.S vs S.Prasanna Babu regarding rent control matters.
Court of Rent Control
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mohanan vs Thomas Mathew et al regarding a petition dismissed for default.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
unknown Defendant Won