Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No. 896/2024

Case between Mohanan vs Thomas Mathew et al regarding a petition dismissed for default.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-28
Duration
Case Code No.
896
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by Mohanan, who was absent during the hearing. The defendants, represented by their advocates, were present and objected to the petition. As the petitioner was not represented, the petition was dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
unknown
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed because the petitioner was absent and did not provide representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed because the petitioner was absent and did not provide representation.
Supporting Evidence
As the petitioner was not represented, the petition was dismissed for default.

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the petitioner is neither present nor represented, the petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thomas Mathew
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rameshkumar
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The KSFE
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The KSFE Peroorkada branch
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A.S Naushad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Sri. A.Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Devi Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Jayapalan Thampi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Unknown
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Lekha A et al regarding petition dismissal
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Unknown Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreejith.V.S et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Unknown Defendant Won
Case between Sajad et al vs Sajna Abdeen regarding dismissal of suit
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Unknown Defendant Won
Case between Vasanthakumari.C et al vs Leela Devi et al regarding matter settled.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Unknown Defendant Won
Case between T.S.Satheesh Kumar vs Vijayaraghavan et al regarding a suit for default dismissal.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Unknown Defendant Won