Case Summary
Smitha S.K filed a suit against B. Syamalakumari and Soumya. S. K. The case was heard and the plaintiff's counsel stated that the suit is not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court concluded that the suit is dismissed as not pressed, with no costs awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Smitha S.K
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- B. Syamalakumari
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soumya. S. K
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. D. Arun
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sandhya. L
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Abhijith. D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was not pressed by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff counsel endorsed that suit is not pressed. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024