Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.308/2025

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Lekha A, Jayachandran V regarding restoration of petition

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-3 years 1 month
Case Code No.
308
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a petition seeking restoration of a previous petition that was dismissed for default. The defendants, Lekha A and Jayachandran V, did not object to the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for restoration of the previous petition due to circumstances beyond the petitioner's control.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for restoration of the previous petition due to circumstances beyond the petitioner's control.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that there was sufficient cause for the absence of the petitioner during the previous hearing.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that there was sufficient cause for the absence of the petitioner during the previous hearing.
Supporting Evidence
After going through the affidavit and records, this court of view that the ground mentioned in the petition is sufficient to restore the suit back to file.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the petition is allowed and R.P.No.874/2023 is restored back to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lekha A
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayachandran V
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Fathima S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.Sri.B Ajayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition R.P.No.874/2023
Evidence:
In the result; the petition is allowed and R.P.No.874/2023 is restored back to file.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 12/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Santhosh Kumar et al regarding restoration of the suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. et al vs Arya Sudhi et al regarding restoration of Original Suit 124/2019
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Nandu et al regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs V.Lali et al regarding Restoration Petition
Court of Additional Munsiff -III
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Kunjumon.T regarding restoration of petitions
Principal Munsiff Court
Restoration Petition Defendant Won