Case Summary
The case involves Union Bank of India represented by its Branch Manager Andrews P. John as the petitioner and Santhosh Kumar as the respondent. The petition is regarding the restoration of the suit which had been previously dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for restoration, reinstating the suit to the file without any order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court viewed that the petition can be allowed based on the materials considered.
The court viewed that the petition can be allowed based on the materials considered.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court viewed that the petition can be allowed based on the materials considered.
The court viewed that the petition can be allowed based on the materials considered.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
After considering the materials the court is of the view that the petition can be allowed. Hence the suit is restored to file.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhosh Kumar. V.
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G. K. Pradeepkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
the petition can be allowed
Evidence:
the court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Santhosh Kumar et al regarding restoration of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Santhosh Kumar et al regarding restoration of the suit.