Case Summary
Canara Bank, represented by its manager, filed a restoration petition. The court heard the petition and allowed the restoration of the original suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition, enabling the suit to be restored to file.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed after considering the materials presented.
The petition was allowed after considering the materials presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed after considering the materials presented.
The petition was allowed after considering the materials presented.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the materials the petition can be allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is allowed and suit is restored to file.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nandu
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subha
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Paper publication produced, Affixture report filed.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Anuroop.V.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed and suit is restored to file.
Evidence:
After considering the materials the petition can be allowed. Hence the petition is allowed and suit is restored to file.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Nandu et al regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Nandu et al regarding restoration of suit