Case Summary
Canara Bank is the petitioner represented by its manager, while V.Lali and M. Sindhu are the defendants. The case concerns a restoration petition that was dismissed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pressed.
The petition was not pressed.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not pressed.
The petition was not pressed.
Supporting Evidence
The restoration petition was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Judgment Evidence:
Restoration petition dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- represented by its Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.Lali
- Relation
- W/o. R. Gopakumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M. Sindhu
- Relation
- W/o. L. Rajan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E. Sulfickar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Restoration petition
Evidence:
Restoration petition dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs V.Lali et al regarding Restoration Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs V.Lali et al regarding Restoration Petition