Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No.1633/2024 — Case between Satheesh.S et al vs Pradhosh Kumar regarding recovery of money
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.994/2018
Case between Santhosh Kumar @ Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar @ Sunil regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, Santhosh Kumar, is seeking recovery of Rs.67,000 from the defendant, Sunil Kumar, for a loan amount of Rs.50,000 borrowed by the defendant with a promissory note. The defendant has failed to repay the loan despite multiple demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1306/2023
Case between Thalhath vs Kala.M regarding recovery of money
Thalhath, a businessman, is suing Kala.M for the recovery of an advance payment related to a property sale. The defendant failed to execute the sale deed and did not repay the advance amount despite demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.250/2023
Case between Canara Bank vs Subramaniam. A regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking the repayment of a loan amounting to ₹4,63,657 from the defendant, Subramaniam. A. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to a decree being awarded to the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.587/2019
Case between Manoj.S vs Biju.K regarding realization of money based on a cheque.
The case involves a dispute between Manoj.S, the plaintiff, and Biju.K, the defendant, regarding the realization of money based on a cheque that Biju.K allegedly issued. The court dismissed the defendant's review petition seeking to summon a witness to prove documents that were not substantiated.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1426/2024
Case between B.Raveendran Nair vs Dr. Manju B.S. et al regarding setting aside an attachment order.
B.Raveendran Nair, the claim petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an attachment order related to a property disputed by his brother. The court determined the attachment was unjustified based on the evidence presented.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1866/2019
Case between M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Mallika et al regarding recovery of money
M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. filed a suit for recovery of money against Mallika and Sreekantan Nair due to default in repayment of a loan. The defendant did not appear in court, and the case proceeded ex parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.474/2015
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
Cindrella Darthalis, a retired municipal employee, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and various municipal authorities for the non-payment of her provident fund and pension benefits. The plaintiff claims she is owed a significant amount due to delays in payment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1492/2024
Case between Binyl Kuruvila Rajan vs Krishnamma T. et al regarding recovery of advance sale consideration
Binyl Kuruvila Rajan, represented by K. Mariyamma, filed an application against Krishnamma T. and others seeking to secure a claim due to a failed sale agreement. The petitioner contends that the defendants have failed to execute the sale deed for a property despite receiving advance payment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.93/2025
Case between Binoj.M.B vs T.R.Jayanthi regarding recovery of money
Binoj.M.B, the plaintiff, is seeking recovery of an advance payment related to a property sale agreement with T.R.Jayanthi, the defendant. The defendant is accused of failing to execute the sale deed and returning the advance.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1043/2020
Case between M.S. Venugopal vs Max Life Insurance company Limited, Neeraj et al regarding recovery of money.
M.S. Venugopal, the plaintiff, filed a suit for recovery of money against Max Life Insurance and others, claiming that he was defrauded. The court previously ruled against him, leading to this review petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1941/2019
Case between Raghu.S vs Mr.Chandrababu.P et al regarding recovery of money
Raghu.S, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Mr.Chandrababu.P and others to recover an amount paid as advance sale consideration for a property. The defendants failed to execute the sale deed as per the agreement, leading to the plaintiff seeking relief.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1863/2019
Case between Indira.G vs Anilkumar. A et al regarding realisation of money.
Indira.G filed a suit against Anilkumar. A and C. Manju for the recovery of Rs.2,46,000/- along with interest, related to a failed property sale agreement. The defendants did not fulfill their part of the contract, prompting the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.508/2023
Case between Laila kumari vs Ansi Rani regarding recovery of money
The plaintiff, Laila kumari, is seeking recovery of a loan amount from her daughter, the defendant Ansi Rani. The case involves the repayment of Rs.2,35,000/- that the plaintiff lent to the defendant over several transactions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1517/2021
Case between Ms/ Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Sanoj.K.K et al regarding recovery of money
The plaintiff, Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd., is seeking to recover a loan amount of ₹1,08,224/- from the first defendant, Sanoj.K.K, who failed to repay the loan. The second defendant, Kuttappan.K.P, is deceased and the first defendant was set ex parte for not responding to the summons.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1174/2018
Case between Andra Bank vs Ajith Khan regarding Suit for realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Andra Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Ajith Khan, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amounting to ₹2,48,308. The defendant allegedly defaulted on the repayment terms of a loan received under the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No 1332/2018
Case between P. Denny vs B.K. Babuchandran Nair regarding recovery of money
The plaintiff, P. Denny, filed a suit against the defendant, B.K. Babuchandran Nair, for recovery of a loan amount. The defendant denied borrowing from the plaintiff and stated that he had settled all financial dealings with the Power of Attorney holder.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.855/2024
Case between V.L. Geethakumari vs Sandhya.B et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, V.L. Geethakumari, has filed a suit against the defendants, Sandhya B and Sandeeepkumar K, to recover a total amount of ₹6,72,042/- which includes cash and gold given over several years. The case revolves around the defendants' failure to return the borrowed amounts and pledged gold despite agreements acknowledging the debt.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.278/2018
Case between Firos Khan vs Anil Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Firos Khan, is suing the defendant, Anil Kumar, for recovering Rs.1,49,172/-. The case involves issues of a landlord-tenant relationship and loans made by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.415/2024
Case between M/s Finessee Market Link Private Limited vs Akhil Shaji regarding recovery of money.
M/s Finessee Market Link Private Limited, represented by its Director Sajjad A. Sait, filed a suit against Akhil Shaji for recovery of ₹1,15,455/- along with interest. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to the case being heard ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.198/2025
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S ARS Colour Care regarding recovery of money.
Canara Bank is suing M/S ARS Colour Care and its proprietor, Sri. Rahul.R.J, for recovery of a loan amount. The defendants did not respond to the suit and were set ex parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1595/2018
Case between Sree Kumari.L vs State Bank of India et al regarding injunction and for other consequential reliefs.
Sree Kumari.L is the plaintiff against State Bank of India and others regarding the recovery of excess family pension payments made to her after her husband's death. The suit seeks to restrain the defendants from recovering any amount from her family pension account.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.2091/2014
Case between B.Thulaseedharan vs Deepu.S regarding recovery of money.
B.Thulaseedharan is the proprietor of groundwater development center engaged in digging bore wells. He filed a suit against Deepu.S for recovering an amount of Rs.52,374/- for services rendered under an agreement for digging a bore well.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.825/2024
Case between B.R Biju Raj et al vs K. Sukumaran Nair regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiffs, B.R Biju Raj and Divya S.P, seek recovery of an advance paid for a property that the defendant, K. Sukumaran Nair, failed to sell as agreed. The defendant did not provide the necessary documents or fulfill conditions of the contract.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 1222/2024
Case between M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association, P.G.Yogarajan vs George Roy regarding recovery of arrears of maintenance charges.
This case involves a petition for recovery of arrears of maintenance charges by the plaintiffs against the defendant. The defendant contends that he was unable to file a written statement due to his wife's serious health issues.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 1222/2024
Case between M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association et al vs George Roy regarding recovery of arrears of maintenance charges
The case involves M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association and P.G. Yogarajan seeking recovery of arrears from defendant George Roy. The defendants failed to file a written statement in time, leading to procedural motions being filed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.423/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Civil Suit
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.598/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding Power of Attorney
The case involves the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and various defendants from the Indian Pentecostal Church of God regarding the acceptance of a power of attorney. The plaintiffs challenge the validity of the power of attorney executed by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.718/2020
Case between Beatrice Miranda vs Sheela Tommy et al regarding violation of injunction order
Beatrice Miranda filed a petition alleging that the respondents violated an injunction order preventing them from trespassing on her property. The court addressed the claims related to the pathway and constructed gate leading to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1475/2022
Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Bindu, is the owner of a building from which she has attempted to evict a tenant due to non-payment of rent. The defendant, Jayakumar, allegedly attempted to trespass into the property, prompting the lawsuit for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1940/2013
Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Subaida et al regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession.
The case involves the plaintiffs seeking a mandatory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants regarding certain shop rooms and a residential building. The additional second plaintiff, who is the son of the first plaintiff, claims the defendants have been occupying the premises without proper rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1963/2023
Case between Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. vs Justin.V.S regarding dismissal of suit
Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. initiated a suit against Justin.V.S. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff despite notice.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1664/2024
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
Mithun John Mathew is the plaintiff against Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala. The suit was finally heard on January 31, 2025, and the court delivered its judgment on the same day.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.184/2025
Case between Asok Kumar et al vs Vinaya Chandran et al regarding injunction
The petitioners, Asok Kumar and Shaji, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Vinaya Chandran, Vinisha Chandran, and Sreejith, to prevent further construction on certain properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.366/2020
Case between Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu vs Sudha regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff, Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu, was absent during the hearing, and there was no representation. As a result, the case was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won