Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.250/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs Subramaniam. A regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-23
Duration
approximately-5 years 2 months 17 days
Case Code No.
250
Case Closed
Thu, 01/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking the repayment of a loan amounting to ₹4,63,657 from the defendant, Subramaniam. A. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to a decree being awarded to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹4,63,657 with interest from the defendant, who did not respond to the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹4,63,657 with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹4,63,657 with interest from the defendant, who did not respond to the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and the outstanding amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and the outstanding amount.
Supporting Evidence
The manager of the plaintiff bank filed an affidavit in-lieu of examination-in-chief reiterating the averments in the plaint... The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendant is liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹4,63,657 with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subramaniam. A
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application dated 06/11/2019, Composite Hypothecation Agreement dated 06/11/2019, Copy of statement of account certified under the Bankers Book Evidence Act.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mansoor. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹4,63,657/- with interest.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 4,63,657 ₹ /- (Rupees Four Lakhs Sixty-Three Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty-Seven only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original loan application executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the Composite Hypothecation Agreement dated 06/11/2019.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the statement of accounts showing the outstanding balance.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 11/06/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Andra Bank vs Ajith Khan regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won