Case Summary
M.S. Venugopal, the plaintiff, filed a suit for recovery of money against Max Life Insurance and others, claiming that he was defrauded. The court previously ruled against him, leading to this review petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the review petition seeking reconsideration of a previous judgment that ruled against the plaintiff. The plaintiff failed to prove there were grounds for a review.
Key Reasoning:
The review petition was dismissed primarily due to the plaintiff's failure to prove any error in the previous judgment.
The review petition was dismissed primarily due to the plaintiff's failure to prove any error in the previous judgment.
Why Defendant Won:
The review petition was dismissed primarily due to the plaintiff's failure to prove any error in the previous judgment.
The review petition was dismissed primarily due to the plaintiff's failure to prove any error in the previous judgment.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has sought for reconsidering the evidence produced before this court and has failed to prove that there is a mistake or error apparent on the face of record.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, I.A.359/2024 is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.S. Venugopal
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Max Life Insurance company Limited
- Relation
- represented by its Managing Director
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Neeraj
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Max Life Insurance company Ltd
- Relation
- represented by its Branch Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karnataka Bank
- Relation
- represented by its Branch Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sonali Mahajan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sankaran Nair.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S. Dharmapalan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Saji Issac. K.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought to recover the plaint amount which was frozen and kept with the defendant.
Evidence:
Hence these issues are found against the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M.S. Venugopal vs Max Life Insurance company Limited, Neeraj et al regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M.S. Venugopal vs Max Life Insurance company Limited, Neeraj et al regarding recovery of money.