Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1306/2023

Case between Thalhath vs Kala.M regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thalhath, a businessman, is suing Kala.M for the recovery of an advance payment related to a property sale. The defendant failed to execute the sale deed and did not repay the advance amount despite demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting the amount claimed along with interest. The defendant was found to be liable for the advance payment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.4,15,996/- with 6% interest from the date of suit till date of realization and cost of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting the amount claimed along with interest. The defendant was found to be liable for the advance payment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established his case through uncontroverted testimony and the agreement that warranted the relief sought.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established his case through uncontroverted testimony and the agreement that warranted the relief sought.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontroverted testimony of PW1 and Ext.A1 document the plaintiff had established his case warranting the grant of relief sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

Thus, the suit is liable to decreed with costs. In the result, the suit decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thalhath
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kala.M
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Agreement for sale
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Renoy Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.4,15,996/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is liable to decreed with costs. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.4,15,996/- (Rupees Four lakhs fifteen thousand nine hundred and ninety six only) with 6% interest from the date of suit till the date of realisation and cost of the suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original agreement for sale
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff established his case warranting the grant of relief sought for with the uncontroverted testimony and this document.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Thalhath vs Kala.M regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Thalhath vs Kala.M regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 06/14/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh.S et al vs Pradhosh Kumar regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Manoj.S vs Biju.K regarding realization of money based on a cheque.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Subramaniam. A regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh Kumar @ Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar @ Sunil regarding recovery of money.
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won