Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No.994/2018

Case between Santhosh Kumar @ Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar @ Sunil regarding recovery of money.

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
approximately-9 years 5 months
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Santhosh Kumar, is seeking recovery of Rs.67,000 from the defendant, Sunil Kumar, for a loan amount of Rs.50,000 borrowed by the defendant with a promissory note. The defendant has failed to repay the loan despite multiple demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting him the amount claimed. The defendant is ordered to pay the total amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of Rs.67,000 with further interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of payment.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting him the amount claimed. The defendant is ordered to pay the total amount with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant owed the amount claimed based on the promissory note and the defendant's failure to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant owed the amount claimed based on the promissory note and the defendant's failure to repay.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the oral and documentary evidence from the side of the plaintiff, it is proved that the defendant owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 67,000/- with further interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of payment from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhosh Kumar @ Santhosh
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunil Kumar @ Sunil
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Promissory Note, Copy of Advocate Notice, Postal receipt, Acknowledgment Card, Reply Notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Nellimoodu Udayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.V.K.Ambika
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff was granted the recovery of Rs.67,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 67,000/- with further interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of payment from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant was ordered to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
2.The defendant shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff as a record of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendant requesting repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply from the defendant concerning the legal notice sent.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Santhosh Kumar @ Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar @ Sunil regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Santhosh Kumar @ Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar @ Sunil regarding recovery of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 08/04/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh.S et al vs Pradhosh Kumar regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Manoj.S vs Biju.K regarding realization of money based on a cheque.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Subramaniam. A regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thalhath vs Kala.M regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won