Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.587/2019

Case between Manoj.S vs Biju.K regarding realization of money based on a cheque.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration
approximately-5 years 4 months
Case Code No.
587
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute between Manoj.S, the plaintiff, and Biju.K, the defendant, regarding the realization of money based on a cheque that Biju.K allegedly issued. The court dismissed the defendant's review petition seeking to summon a witness to prove documents that were not substantiated.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the review petition filed by the defendant, concluding that the grounds for review were insufficient and there were no errors in the previous order.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the review petition filed by the defendant, concluding that the grounds for review were insufficient and there were no errors in the previous order.
Key Reasoning:
The review petition did not provide valid grounds for the court's reconsideration of the order.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The grounds raised by the petitioner for the review of the order do not meet the criteria for material and analogous grounds under Order 47 Rule 1 of the CPC.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; petition is rejected. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manoj.S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju.K
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Ext.B1 to Ext.B4 documents marked as the defendant’s evidence.

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Anil Kumar.V.C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ashok P Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Review petition filed to review the order passed in IA.No.06/2024.
Evidence:
there were no palpable errors in the order, this court is of the view that the petition is only liable to be rejected under Order XLVII Rule 4 (1) CPC and resultantly, I order so.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Documents
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Marked as the defendant’s evidence in the case.
Reference:
Ext.B1 to Ext.B4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 09/22/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.L. Geethakumari vs Sandhya.B et al regarding recovery of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Andra Bank vs Ajith Khan regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Subramaniam. A regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won