Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.855/2024

Case between V.L. Geethakumari vs Sandhya.B et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-04
Duration
approximately-1 year 22 days
Case Code No.
855
Case Closed
Sat, 10/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, V.L. Geethakumari, has filed a suit against the defendants, Sandhya B and Sandeeepkumar K, to recover a total amount of ₹6,72,042/- which includes cash and gold given over several years. The case revolves around the defendants' failure to return the borrowed amounts and pledged gold despite agreements acknowledging the debt.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹6,72,042/- from the first defendant, Sandhya B, as the second defendant, Sandeeepkumar K, was not proven to be involved in the borrowing.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹6,72,042/- with 6% interest and costs from the first defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹6,72,042/- from the first defendant, Sandhya B, as the second defendant, Sandeeepkumar K, was not proven to be involved in the borrowing.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved her claim through evidence and testimony which supported her right to recover the amount due.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved her claim through evidence and testimony which supported her right to recover the amount due.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹6,72,042/- is due from the 1st defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is partly decreed as follows: a) The suit against the 2nd defendant stands dismissed. b) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 6,72,042/- from the 1st defendant with 6% interest from the date of the suit till date of realization from the 1st defendant and her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.L. Geethakumari
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sandhya. B
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sandeeepkumar. K
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
A1, A2: Original agreement and agreement dated 19.03.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Rajeshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹6,72,042/- from the 1st defendant with interest.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is partly decreed as follows: b) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹6,72,042/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Seventy-Two Thousand and Forty-Two only) from the 1st defendant with 6% interest from the date of the suit till date of realization from the 1st defendant and her assets.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit against the 2nd defendant stands dismissed.
Evidence:
a) The suit against the 2nd defendant stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The first defendant signed a written agreement acknowledging the debt and agreeing to repay the amounts.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff entered into another agreement with the first defendant to pay off dues to recover the pledged gold.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 10/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Andra Bank vs Ajith Khan regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Manoj.S vs Biju.K regarding realization of money based on a cheque.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Subramaniam. A regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won