Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1517/2021

Case between Ms/ Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Sanoj.K.K et al regarding recovery of money

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-07-16
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd., is seeking to recover a loan amount of ₹1,08,224/- from the first defendant, Sanoj.K.K, who failed to repay the loan. The second defendant, Kuttappan.K.P, is deceased and the first defendant was set ex parte for not responding to the summons.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the claimed amount along with interest and costs. The first defendant was found liable for the repayment due to his failure to respond to the legal proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,08,224/- with interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum and costs from the first defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the claimed amount along with interest and costs. The first defendant was found liable for the repayment due to his failure to respond to the legal proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the debt through unchallenged evidence, as the first defendant did not contest the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the debt through unchallenged evidence, as the first defendant did not contest the case.
Supporting Evidence
From the available evidences, it is proved that the plaintiff is entitled for a decree for realization of the plaint amount with interest.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,08,224/- from the 1st defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ms/ Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanoj.K.K
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuttappan.K.P
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original promissory note, Agreement of hypothecation, Statement of accounts, Lawyer’s notice, Postal receipts, Acknowledgment card, Returned card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanna Kumar Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize ₹1,08,224/- from the 1st defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹1,08,224/- with interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests from the date of suit till date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests till the date of decree.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests from the date of suit till date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize the costs of the suit from the 1st defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize the costs of the suit from the 1st defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original promissory note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the terms under which the loan was sanctioned and the hypothecation of the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of the amount due by the defendants as per the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates attempts to recover the debt prior to litigation.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim of communication regarding the debt recovery.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the receipt of the debt communication by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the communication sent to the defendants was not successful.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Ms/ Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Sanoj.K.K et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Ms/ Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Sanoj.K.K et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Manoj.S vs Biju.K regarding realization of money based on a cheque.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Subramaniam. A regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thalhath vs Kala.M regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh Kumar @ Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar @ Sunil regarding recovery of money.
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won