Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.825/2024

Case between B.R Biju Raj et al vs K. Sukumaran Nair regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
approximately-4 years 1 month
Case Code No.
825
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, B.R Biju Raj and Divya S.P, seek recovery of an advance paid for a property that the defendant, K. Sukumaran Nair, failed to sell as agreed. The defendant did not provide the necessary documents or fulfill conditions of the contract.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them the recovery of the advance amount paid. The plaintiffs were found entitled to interest at 6% per annum until realization.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiffs are entitled to realize a sum of 5,00,000/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them the recovery of the advance amount paid. The plaintiffs were found entitled to interest at 6% per annum until realization.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs demonstrated a clear breach of contract by the defendant and provided sufficient evidence of their claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs demonstrated a clear breach of contract by the defendant and provided sufficient evidence of their claims.
Supporting Evidence
The court finds that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover the advance paid as the contract provisions were not honored by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is partly decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiffs are entitled to realize a sum of 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) from the defendant and his assets, together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
B.R Biju Raj
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Divya S.P
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Sukumaran Nair
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original sale agreement, Copy of the Advocate notice, Postal receipt, Acknowledgement card, Copy of the petition.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Prasanth Pai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Krishna Prasad S.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are entitled to realize a sum of 5,00,000/- from the defendant along with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realize a sum of 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) from the defendant and his assets, together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement outlines the terms under which the defendant agreed to sell the property to the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued demanding specific performance or refund of the advance.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt confirming the delivery of the advocate notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment card signed by the defendant upon receipt of the advocate notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petition filed before the police seeking return of the advance amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of the Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The receipt related to the petition filed before the police.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plan produced during the examination, allegedly prepared by the defendant showing the proposed pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 11/03/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Andra Bank vs Ajith Khan regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Manoj.S vs Biju.K regarding realization of money based on a cheque.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Subramaniam. A regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won