Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 1222/2024

Case between M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association et al vs George Roy regarding recovery of arrears of maintenance charges

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-12-03
Duration
approximately-1 year 1 day
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association and P.G. Yogarajan seeking recovery of arrears from defendant George Roy. The defendants failed to file a written statement in time, leading to procedural motions being filed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application to strike off the defense and allowed the defendant's application to accept the written statement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application to strike off the defense and allowed the defendant's application to accept the written statement.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that striking off the defense would not serve justice as the defendant had shown interest in contesting the matter.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that striking off the defense would not serve justice as the defendant had shown interest in contesting the matter.
Supporting Evidence
However, striking off their defense, at this stage when they have filed the written statement will not serve justice.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA No.04/2025 is dismissed. No order as to costs. In the result, IA No.05/2025 is allowed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.G.Yogarajan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Roy
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R.Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. J.K.Ajith Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
IA No.04/2025 is dismissed.
Evidence:
In the result, IA No.04/2025 is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
IA No.05/2025 is allowed.
Evidence:
In the result, IA No.05/2025 is allowed. No order as to costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association et al vs George Roy regarding recovery of arrears of maintenance charges
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association et al vs George Roy regarding recovery of arrears of maintenance charges

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association, P.G.Yogarajan vs George Roy regarding recovery of arrears of maintenance charges.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Finessee Market Link Private Limited vs Akhil Shaji regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Laila kumari vs Ansi Rani regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indira.G vs Anilkumar. A et al regarding realisation of money.
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between B.Raveendran Nair vs Dr. Manju B.S. et al regarding setting aside an attachment order.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won