Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.508/2023

Case between Laila kumari vs Ansi Rani regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-06-20
Duration
approximately-5 years 1 month
Case Closed
Fri, 06/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Laila kumari, is seeking recovery of a loan amount from her daughter, the defendant Ansi Rani. The case involves the repayment of Rs.2,35,000/- that the plaintiff lent to the defendant over several transactions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing her to recover Rs.2,35,000/- along with interest and costs from the defendant. The evidence supported the plaintiff's claim regarding the repayment of borrowed amounts.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹2,35,000/- from the defendant and her assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing her to recover Rs.2,35,000/- along with interest and costs from the defendant. The evidence supported the plaintiff's claim regarding the repayment of borrowed amounts.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the plaintiff's evidence credible and unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the plaintiff's evidence credible and unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the oral and documentary evidence from the side of the plaintiff, it is proved that the defendant owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹2,35,000/- from the defendant and her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Laila kumari
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ansi Rani
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Statement of Account from 13.05.2020 to 19.10.2022, Original Promissory Note dated 01.09.2021, Counter Bill of Chellan Payment
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Vishnu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹2,35,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹2,35,000/- from the defendant and her assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 9% per annum.
Evidence:
2.Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 9% per annum with monthly rests from 18/05/2020 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Evidence:
3.Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
4.Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the transactions made by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original promissory note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal document signed by the defendant acknowledging the debt to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Counter Bill of Chellan Payment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to a payment made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Laila kumari vs Ansi Rani regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Laila kumari vs Ansi Rani regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 05/18/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association, P.G.Yogarajan vs George Roy regarding recovery of arrears of maintenance charges.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Aquavista Apartment Owners and Allottees Association et al vs George Roy regarding recovery of arrears of maintenance charges
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Finessee Market Link Private Limited vs Akhil Shaji regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indira.G vs Anilkumar. A et al regarding realisation of money.
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between B.Raveendran Nair vs Dr. Manju B.S. et al regarding setting aside an attachment order.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won