Case Summary
B.Thulaseedharan is the proprietor of groundwater development center engaged in digging bore wells. He filed a suit against Deepu.S for recovering an amount of Rs.52,374/- for services rendered under an agreement for digging a bore well.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.52,374/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay Rs.52,374/- with interest for the recovery of money for the services rendered for digging a bore well.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff proved his claim through credible evidence despite the defendant's total denial of the agreements and facts.
The court found that the plaintiff proved his claim through credible evidence despite the defendant's total denial of the agreements and facts.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff proved his claim through credible evidence despite the defendant's total denial of the agreements and facts.
The court found that the plaintiff proved his claim through credible evidence despite the defendant's total denial of the agreements and facts.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff proved his case through documents and the court found the defendant's denial evasive and unsupported by evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay 52,374/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.40,600/- from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- B.Thulaseedharan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Deepu.S
- Party Age
- 35
Plaintiffs Documents
Work order signed by PW1 and defendant, Detailed bill and its counter foil, Completion report, Copy of Complaint.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G.V.Sudheer Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.G. Aravind
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to a decree of realization of Rs.52,374/- with interest.
Evidence:
Considering the aforesaid facts, plaintiff is entitled for a decree of realisation of Rs.52,374/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.40,600/- from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Work Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The work order issued by the defendant to the plaintiff for execution of work for constructing a bore well.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Detailed Bill
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The bill issued by the ground water development center in favor of the defendant detailing the charges incurred.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Completion Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The report dated 28/04/2012 evidencing the completion of the work.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Copy of complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copies of the complaint filed by the defendant before S.I. police, revealing admission of fact by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4 and A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between B.Thulaseedharan vs Deepu.S regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between B.Thulaseedharan vs Deepu.S regarding recovery of money.