Similar Cases
Based on: Original Suit 493/2018 — Case between Sreenivasan vs Shibu.S. regarding execution of decree
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS No. 1898/2019
Case between Krishnan kutti vs Manikantan regarding execution of money decree
This case involves Krishnan kutti, the judgment debtor, and Manikantan, the decree holder, concerning an execution application related to the sale of property for the recovery of a money decree. The judgment debtor seeks to adjourn the sale, claiming non-compliance by the decree holder.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.No. 1184/2008
Case between Jalaja et al vs Jayanthi et al regarding Execution application
This case involves Jalaja and others as petitioners who are decree holders against Jayanthi and others, the judgment debtors. The court allowed the execution application and directed the appointment of an advocate commissioner.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
EA.No. 217/2025
Case between Pattom Service Cooperative bank Ltd vs Shajira regarding execution application.
This case involves Pattom Service Cooperative bank Ltd as the decree holder and Shajira as the judgment debtor. The court heard the execution application and passed an order regarding a previous attachment.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1221/2019
Case between Kesavankutty Nair. J vs Leena Mohanan et al regarding Execution Application
The petitioner, Kesavankutty Nair. J, seeks a stay on an order related to an execution application. The defendants are Leena Mohanan and Mohanan, who are the decree holders in this matter.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.No.1709/1991
Case between Suresh.R.K et al vs Sethukutty Amma et al regarding Execution Application
The case involves Suresh.R.K and Radhakrishnan Nair as petitioners/judgment debtors, and Sethukutty Amma, T.R.Rajeev Kumar, and others as decree holders/judgment debtors. The dispute arises from an execution application regarding a mediation settlement that has not been fully complied with.
Execution Application
OS.1197/2009
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs V.Shailaja Kumari et al regarding execution of a decree
The case involves the Branch Manager of Canara Bank seeking execution of a decree against V.Shailaja Kumari and A.B.Mohanakumar. The execution petition was dismissed due to lack of action by the decree holder despite repeated directions.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
EA.No.345/2025
Case between Lakshimi R. Nair vs Karunaikumar C.M et al regarding eviction proceedings.
Lakshimi R. Nair, Secretary of the Chempazhanthy Agricultural Improvement Co-operative Society, has filed a petition against Karunaikumar C.M and S. Jayakumar regarding an eviction order. The petitioner claims she was not part of the original agreement and was unaware of the eviction proceedings.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.565/2008
Case between Baby Padmam et al vs Dodwell.C et al regarding Implementation of Judgment Debtor
This case involves the petitioners, Baby Padmam and Sherin B Das, who are the decree holders. They filed an application to implead the legal representatives of the deceased first judgment debtor, Dodwell.C.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.342/2015
Case between Krishnan Kutty Nair vs Vincent.G regarding execution application for property demarcation.
Krishnan Kutty Nair filed an execution application seeking to ascertain and demarcate a property. Vincent.G is the counter petitioner with no objections filed.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
EA.No.2/2025
Case between Alex J Lopez et al vs Tessy Roy regarding obstruction in execution proceedings
The case involves Alex J Lopez's legal heirs as plaintiffs and Tessy Roy as the defendant regarding an obstruction petition in execution proceedings related to a prior decree. The plaintiffs are seeking to enforce a court order, but the defendant has filed an obstruction petition claiming rights to the property.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
EA.No.1/2025
Case between Kazhakkuttam Service Co-operative bank Limited vs Prasad M.L regarding Execution of Attachment
Kazhakkuttam Service Co-operative Bank Limited is the decree holder, while Prasad M.L is the judgment debtor in this execution application regarding the attachment petition. The court has allowed the execution application and vacated the previous order of attachment.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
EA.No.212/2025
Case between Shijin Jose et al vs Asha Prakash et al regarding execution application
The case involves a petition by Shijin Jose and Jose for the return of articles taken into custody during a previous execution order. The court has permitted the return of these articles under specific conditions.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 2588/2014
Case between V.Suresh Kumar vs G.Unnikrishnan regarding setting aside sale in execution proceedings.
V.Suresh Kumar, the judgment debtor, filed an application to set aside a sale conducted by the court wherein G.Unnikrishnan is the decree holder. The application contended that there were irregularities in the auction proceedings.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS 1738/2005
Case between Director of Health Services vs Sreekantan regarding garnishee application
This case involves a petition filed by the Director of Health Services as a garnishee regarding the attachment of salary and benefits due to the deceased Anil Kumar. The court examined the claims and objections raised regarding the garnishee's role and the proper handling of the deceased's financial entitlements.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.301/2009
Case between Jayagopan Nair vs Krishnapillai regarding Execution Application
Jayagopan Nair is the petitioner or decree holder in this execution application, while Krishnapillai is the counter petitioner or judgment debtor. The case involves the release of a specified amount from the judgment debtor's account to the decree holder.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1383/2021
Case between S. Sanalkumar vs Chevron Bulders & Relators(P) Ltd et al regarding Execution of Decree
S. Sanalkumar is the decree holder seeking execution of a decree against Chevron Builders & Relators (P) Ltd and its managing director, Jose Thomas. The court allowed the application for discovery of assets necessary for execution.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.524/1978
Case between M.Divakaran et al vs Gouri Parvathy et al regarding Execution application
The case involves M.Divakaran and his family as petitioners against Gouri Parvathy and other judgment debtors regarding an execution application. The court dismissed the execution application for default due to the absence of the petitioners.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
O.S.No.6628/2016
Case between Jacob Mathew et al vs Share wealth Chitts Ltd regarding execution of decree
Jacob Mathew and Ambily T Chacko are the decree holders seeking execution against Share wealth Chitts Ltd. The case concerns the legal permissibility of simultaneous execution of a decree from different courts.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS No.175/2017
Case between Kochurani vs Shainu Claire Mathews et al regarding stay of execution proceedings
Kochurani, the petitioner, seeks to stay the execution of a decree for which she is a judgment debtor. She claims residential rights based on an order from a maintenance tribunal but the court finds that there are no grounds to stay the execution.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
E.P. No.07/2020 in os. No.56/2018
Case between Lochan Varghese vs Annamma Thomas @ Chinnamma et al regarding Execution application
Lochan Varghese filed an execution application against Annamma Thomas @ Chinnamma and Shibu John. The court dismissed the execution petition for default.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 24/2024
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
Babu Rajan N. and Raveendran Pillai are suing the Government of Kerala for a declaration of civil death of their brother, Mr. Rajendran N., who has been missing for 28 years. They require this declaration to facilitate obtaining a legal heirship certificate to pledge their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.41/2025
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
Sheena, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Anvar and Ramabhadran to stop an illegal chicken stall operating in a shop room owned by Ramabhadran. The plaintiff alleges threats and illegal constructions facilitated by Anvar.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 117/2021
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
The case involves The Federal Bank, Ltd represented by its Manager against defendants Siyad. S and Haseena Beevi. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
The petitioners, children of the deceased Solomon Cruz, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property purchased by their father, while the defendants claim rights over a portion of the property. The case involves disputes over property tax and land boundaries.
Civil Suit
OS No. 361/2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
Sunitha, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant, to prevent alleged encroachment on her property. The dispute arises from a badminton court construction agreement and ownership claims over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 361/ 2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction
Sunitha, the plaintiff, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant. The case involves a dispute over property rights and the construction of a badminton court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 43/2025
Case between Nithin Krishna vs Gireesh et al regarding suit dismissal
Nithin Krishna is the plaintiff, and Gireesh along with others are the defendants in this case. The plaintiff filed a memo of not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 156/ 2025
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
The case involves A. Shahjahan and others as plaintiffs against Shaji and Krishna Kumar regarding a petition for an injunction related to property encroachment. The court finds that a prima facie case exists for granting an interim injunction to prevent irreparable injury to the plaintiffs.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 229/2021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The case involves Ayisha Beevi as the plaintiff, represented by her son Navas, against defendants Noushad and Shajahan. The court is hearing a petition regarding an injunction to prevent the defendants from alienating certain property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 229/22021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The plaintiffs, Ayisha Beevi and her son Navas, are seeking to prevent the defendants, Noushad and Shajahan, from alienating a property. The court has issued an interim order to maintain the status quo until a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 147/2025
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
Anoop. P is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Lissy. P. S, the respondent. The court determined that a prima facie case was made out and granted a temporary injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 219/ 2024
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Resmi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against her father Sureshkumar and his siblings, who are allegedly trying to alienate property against her father's interest. The petitioner claims her father is vulnerable due to his health conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 79/2025
Case between Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust et al vs Raju et al regarding election to the director board of first petitioner trust
This case involves a petition by Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust and others against Raju and others regarding preventing the election to the director board of the trust. The defendants were restrained from interfering with the election process until the suit is disposed of.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 179/2024
Case between Nahas vs Sabansa et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Nahas filed a suit against Sabansa and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the petitioner’s counsel submitted a memo indicating no further pursuit of the action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 340/2024
Case between Mahesh Lal vs Salimkuty et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Mahesh Lal filed a suit against Salimkuty and Sachin S. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP.No 15/2024 IN OS No. 59//2008
Case between Udha vs Chandramgathan et al regarding execution of decree.
The plaintiffs, Udha and a deceased party Ponnamma, are executing a decree against the defendants, which include Chandramgathan and his legal heirs. The court found that the execution petition has been satisfied.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 137/2025
Case between Reenamony vs Remany, Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju regarding injunction
Reenamony is the petitioner seeking protection against the defendants Remany and Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju. The case involves a request for an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 72/2025
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
The plaintiffs, led by Shahida Beevi, and defendants, led by Nahas, settled their disputes through out-of-court discussions. The joint compromise was accepted by the court, leading to the decree.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 150/2016
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
Rajesh and Sheeja are the plaintiffs, while Sofiya and Bijeer are the defendants. The case involved a dispute that was settled through out-of-court discussions, leading to a joint compromise.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
The plaintiffs are seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from constructing on a property that the plaintiffs claim. The dispute involves allegations of encroachment and ownership over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Shobhana et al regarding IA. 01/2024
The petitioners, including Sarasamma, Prasobha, and Velayudhan, are involved in a case against the respondents, Shobhana and Pradeep, regarding an interim application. The court has allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner for inspection.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.136/2025
Case between Vijayamma vs Anu et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Vijayamma filed a petition seeking an ad-interim injunction against Anu and others. The court found that failure to grant the injunction could cause irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 132/ 2025
Case between Kannan vs Anoob. V.R. regarding injunction
Kannan is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Anoob. V.R. The court determined that granting the injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 166/2019
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
Thulaseedharan, the plaintiff, has died, and no legal heirs have taken steps to continue the case. As a result, the court decided to abate the suit.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 167/2019
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
Shine is the plaintiff and Thulaseedharan is the defendant. The court has abated the suit due to the death of the defendant and the lack of actions taken to implead the legal heir.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 403/2019
Case between Anilkumar vs Bindhu regarding execution petition
Anilkumar is the decree holder in this execution petition against Bindhu, the judgment debtor. The court dismissed the execution petition as default due to the absence of the decree holder during the proceedings.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
OS NO. 131/2025
Case between R. Snehalatha vs Sarachandra Babu regarding injunction
R. Snehalatha filed a petition against Sarachandra Babu seeking an injunction to prevent interference with her water access. The court determined that granting the injunction was necessary to avoid irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won