Case Summary
Sreenivasan, the petitioner and decree holder, is executing a petition against Shibu.S., the judgment debtor. The execution petition was finally heard and allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Execution petition restored to file
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was allowed and is restored to file by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed with no objection filed.
The petition was allowed with no objection filed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed with no objection filed.
The petition was allowed with no objection filed.
Supporting Evidence
The court heard and perused the records. Hence the petition is allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is allowed and the execution petition is restored to file.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreenivasan
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shibu.S.
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Roy.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Jayakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The execution petition is restored to file.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is allowed and the execution petition is restored to file.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreenivasan vs Shibu.S. regarding execution of decree
Case Code Year
Case between Sreenivasan vs Shibu.S. regarding execution of decree