Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 1898/2019

Case between Krishnan kutti vs Manikantan regarding execution of money decree

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
approximately-3 years 1 day
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Krishnan kutti, the judgment debtor, and Manikantan, the decree holder, concerning an execution application related to the sale of property for the recovery of a money decree. The judgment debtor seeks to adjourn the sale, claiming non-compliance by the decree holder.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application to adjourn the sale filed by the judgment debtor, finding no bona fides in the request. The court upheld that the decree holder had complied with the necessary legal provisions for the execution.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application to adjourn the sale filed by the judgment debtor, finding no bona fides in the request. The court upheld that the decree holder had complied with the necessary legal provisions for the execution.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the decree holder properly followed the required procedures and that there was no substantial injury to the judgment debtor.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
It was ordered for sale of property on 01/04/2025 and directed the decree holder to take steps to publish the proclamation with details in a newspaper. The court found no substantial injury would be caused to the judgment debtor by the non-compliance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence for the aforesaid reasons, I find no bonafides in the present petition and it is liable to be dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manikantan
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnan kutti
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.A. Hakkim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.C. Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The judgment debtor requested to adjourn the sale of the property to allow for compliance with the publication of proclamation and to provide more time to pay the decretal amount.
Evidence:
Hence for the aforesaid reasons, I find no bonafides in the present petition and it is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Court Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court order outlines the proceedings and decision regarding the execution application filed by the judgment debtor.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishnan kutti vs Manikantan regarding execution of money decree
Case Code Year
Case between Krishnan kutti vs Manikantan regarding execution of money decree

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs V.Shailaja Kumari et al regarding execution of a decree
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Suresh.R.K et al vs Sethukutty Amma et al regarding Execution Application
Principal Munsiff Court
Execution Application Unknown
Case between Kesavankutty Nair. J vs Leena Mohanan et al regarding Execution Application
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Pattom Service Cooperative bank Ltd vs Shajira regarding execution application.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Jalaja et al vs Jayanthi et al regarding Execution application
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Plaintiff Won