Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EA.No.212/2025

Case between Shijin Jose et al vs Asha Prakash et al regarding execution application

Court
Court of Principal Munsiff
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-09-10
Duration
Case Code No.
212
Case Closed
Wed, 09/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition by Shijin Jose and Jose for the return of articles taken into custody during a previous execution order. The court has permitted the return of these articles under specific conditions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the execution application for the return of custody articles to the petitioner under the presence of Amin.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Return of articles taken into custody
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the execution application for the return of custody articles to the petitioner under the presence of Amin.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner was permitted to receive specific articles as the execution application was allowed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner was permitted to receive specific articles as the execution application was allowed.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner is permitted to receive the articles which were taken into custody during the time of execution order of this Court.

Judgment Evidence:

The Execution Application is allowed as above.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shijin Jose
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asha Prakash
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Prakash
Party Age
64
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. Alex Babu Bunglawil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R. Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is permitted to receive the articles which were taken into custody during the time of execution order of this Court.
Evidence:
The Execution Application is allowed as above.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EA.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 09/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Alex J Lopez et al vs Tessy Roy regarding obstruction in execution proceedings
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Kazhakkuttam Service Co-operative bank Limited vs Prasad M.L regarding Execution of Attachment
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Lakshimi R. Nair vs Karunaikumar C.M et al regarding eviction proceedings.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Krishnan kutti vs Manikantan regarding execution of money decree
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Pattom Service Cooperative bank Ltd vs Shajira regarding execution application.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Plaintiff Won