Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.565/2008

Case between Baby Padmam et al vs Dodwell.C et al regarding Implementation of Judgment Debtor

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration
Case Code No.
565
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the petitioners, Baby Padmam and Sherin B Das, who are the decree holders. They filed an application to implead the legal representatives of the deceased first judgment debtor, Dodwell.C.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the execution application to implead the legal representatives of the deceased first judgment debtor. The additional judgment debtor had no objections to being made a party to the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the execution application to implead the legal representatives of the deceased first judgment debtor. The additional judgment debtor had no objections to being made a party to the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The additional judgment debtor was found to be necessary for just and proper disposal of the execution petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The additional judgment debtor was found to be necessary for just and proper disposal of the execution petition.
Supporting Evidence
Having considered rival contentions, proposed additional Judgment Debtor has no contentions as to she is not the legal heir of deceased first Judgment Debtor. That being so it is necessary to implead her in party array for just and proper disposal of Execution petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Execution Application allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baby Padmam
Party Age
79
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sherin B Das
Party Age
49
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dodwell.C
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reghunatha Pillai
Party Age
78
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rentnamma
Party Age
80
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Premchand
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
D.Padma
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abhishek.R.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.S.Kalkura
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Execution Application allowed to implead additional Judgment Debtor.
Evidence:
Hence Execution Application allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2008

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jayagopan Nair vs Krishnapillai regarding Execution Application
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs V.Shailaja Kumari et al regarding execution of a decree
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Krishnan kutti vs Manikantan regarding execution of money decree
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Pattom Service Cooperative bank Ltd vs Shajira regarding execution application.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Jalaja et al vs Jayanthi et al regarding Execution application
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Plaintiff Won