Similar Cases
Based on: OS.No.322/2020 — Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Chithra et al regarding realisation of money.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.188/2020
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. filed a suit against Santha and others for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs.61,914. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite receiving notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.504/2015
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
The plaintiff Ramesan seeks a partition of the ancestral property claimed jointly with the defendants, who are siblings. The case arises from disputes over the joint possession and ownership of property following the death of their mother.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.745/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, seeks to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendant group Ayodhya Kudumbasree, which has defaulted on repayments. The case involves multiple members of the self-help group represented by their officials.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.834/2023
Case between Jyothishmathi vs Krishna Kumar regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Jyothishmathi, has filed a suit against the defendant, Krishna Kumar, for the realization of a loan amount of Rs.5,00,000/- borrowed by the defendant. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite being notified and placed ex-parte in the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1349/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit and its members for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests and notices sent by the bank.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1475/2022
Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Bindu, is the owner of a building from which she has attempted to evict a tenant due to non-payment of rent. The defendant, Jayakumar, allegedly attempted to trespass into the property, prompting the lawsuit for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1613/2018
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank seeking the repayment of a loan amount of ₹58,270/- from the defendants, Shibu.V and Krishnapanicker, who defaulted on their loan payments. The defendants were set ex parte due to their absence in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1640/2023
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
The case involves Selvaraj. A as the plaintiff and his father-in-law Mony @ Maniyan as the defendant, regarding the recovery of a loan amount of ₹2,00,000/- that was not repaid. The plaintiff claims the amount along with interest after repeated demands went unheeded.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1645/2022
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Remya.S et al regarding recovery of money.
M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants due to their failure to repay. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1664/2024
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
Mithun John Mathew is the plaintiff against Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala. The suit was finally heard on January 31, 2025, and the court delivered its judgment on the same day.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.184/2025
Case between Asok Kumar et al vs Vinaya Chandran et al regarding injunction
The petitioners, Asok Kumar and Shaji, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Vinaya Chandran, Vinisha Chandran, and Sreejith, to prevent further construction on certain properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.180/2023
Case between Canara Bank vs D. Hari Krishnan et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
Canara Bank has filed a suit against D. Hari Krishnan and his mother, Mallika. B for non-repayment of an educational loan that has become a non-performing asset.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1978/2022
Case between Aji vs Rajasekharan Nair regarding injunction and other consequential reliefs.
Aji filed a suit against Rajasekharan Nair seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property sale agreement. The defendant failed to execute the sale deed as agreed, leading to the plaintiff's legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1984/2022
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
The case involves The Federal Bank Limited, which granted a personal loan to Benoy Francis. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayments despite repeated notices.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1285 /2024
Case between Smitha S.K vs B. Syamalakumari et al regarding dismissal of suit
Smitha S.K filed a suit against B. Syamalakumari and Soumya. S. K. The case was heard and the plaintiff's counsel stated that the suit is not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1315/2020
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Federal Bank Ltd, is seeking to recover an educational loan amount from the defendants, who have failed to repay despite repeated demands. The case was heard ex-parte due to the defendants not filing a written statement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.343 /2021
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Thankam.R regarding suit dismissal
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Thankam.R as the defendant. The plaintiff submitted that the suit is not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1385 /2023
Case between Chandran. P vs Vijayan. P regarding mediation settlement
The case involves Chandran. P as the plaintiff and Vijayan. P as the defendant. The matter was settled through mediation, and the court decreed the suit in accordance with the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1429 /2019
Case between Sheeja V.J vs Asha regarding rejection of plaint
Sheeja V.J is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Asha. The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of a remitted court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1465 /2024
Case between Francis Pereira vs Dominic Gomez et al regarding plaint rejection.
Francis Pereira filed a suit against Dominic Gomez and Jacquelin Gomez. The court rejected the plaint due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.5/2022
Case between S.Sreejith.IPS vs K.M.Shajahan regarding damages
The plaintiff, S.Sreejith.IPS, an IPS Officer, is suing the defendant, K.M.Shajahan, for defamation and damages caused by scandalous statements made online. The defendant failed to appear in court, leading to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.145/2022
Case between Sandhya G.R vs Bindu G.R regarding partition of property
The plaintiff, Sandhya G.R, and the defendant, Bindu G.R, are sisters involved in a partition suit regarding properties inherited from their deceased parents. The plaintiff claims her right to a share in the properties, which the defendant contests.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.475 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
Canara Bank filed a suit against M/s M.R.K Agency for the realization of a loan amounting to ₹9,89,111 due to a breach of loan agreement. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayments, claiming business losses due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.492/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Nazar Abdul et al regarding realization of money.
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd is suing Nazar Abdul and others for repayment of a loan. The defendants have not appeared in court and owe ₹62,403/- with interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1273/2023
Case between The Federal Bank vs Anil.V.Thomas regarding suit dismissal
The Federal Bank filed a suit against Anil.V.Thomas. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1300/2020
Case between Vijayan. V vs Vidyadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Vijayan.V filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Vidyadharan and Mini regarding a compound wall constructed on his property. The plaintiff claims that the defendants threatened to demolish the wall due to damage allegedly caused by trees on their property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065 /2024
Case between State Bank of India vs David Ghevarghese regarding dismissal of suit
State Bank of India filed a suit against David Ghevarghese, who is represented by his Power of Attorney Holder. The suit was ultimately dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.255 /2024
Case between Canara Bank represented by Anand. S vs The Adithya Group regarding dismissal of suit
Canara Bank, represented by its manager Anand. S, filed a suit against The Adithya Group, represented by Sajith Kumar. The case was finally heard and dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1409/2022
Case between FEMY9 vs Joseph Simon et al regarding Suit dismissal
The case involves a suit filed by FEMY9, represented by K.O Zacharia, against defendants Joseph Simon and Meena Joseph. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.2018/2022
Case between Vijayamohanan.A vs D.K. Santhosh Kumar regarding dismissal of suit
Vijayamohanan.A is the plaintiff, and D.K. Santhosh Kumar is the defendant in this case. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, and the case was ultimately dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1169/2023
Case between Shamla Beevi vs Abdul Kalam Azad regarding a suit
Shamla Beevi is the plaintiff and Abdul Kalam Azad is the defendant. The suit was heard and the plaintiff decided not to press the case, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1300/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Abilash.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is suing the defendant, Abilash.C, for the recovery of a loan amount of ₹5,08,349. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests from the bank.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1313/2020
Case between B. Sreekala et al vs Reji. K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who were encroaching on a lane they used for access. The defendants, who are relatives of a deceased purported owner, were attempting to construct a wall on the plaintiffs' access way.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won