Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.180/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs D. Hari Krishnan et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-30
Duration
approximately-8 years 5 months 26 days
Case Code No.
180
Case Closed
Thu, 01/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank has filed a suit against D. Hari Krishnan and his mother, Mallika. B for non-repayment of an educational loan that has become a non-performing asset.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that Canara Bank is entitled to realize an amount of ₹4,74,094/- along with interest from the defendants. The defendants were found liable for the repayment due to the loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹4,74,094/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that Canara Bank is entitled to realize an amount of ₹4,74,094/- along with interest from the defendants. The defendants were found liable for the repayment due to the loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established the defendants' liability through evidence presented in court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established the defendants' liability through evidence presented in court.
Supporting Evidence
The manager of the plaintiff bank filed an affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief, reiterating the averments in the plaint and gave evidence as PW1. According to PW1, Ext.A1 is the original loan application dated 04/08/2016 executed by the defendants and Ext.A2 is the Educational Loan Agreement dated 26/08/2016.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 4,74,094₹ (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy-Four Thousand and Ninety-Four only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
D. Hari Krishnan
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mallika. B
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application dated 04/08/2016, Educational Loan Agreement dated 26/08/2016, copy of statement of account from 01.08.2016 to 14.12.2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Bhadra. S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹4,74,094/- with interest from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 4,74,094 ₹/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy-Four Thousand and Ninety-Four only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application executed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Educational Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Educational Loan Agreement dated 26/08/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the statement of accounts certified under the Bankers' Book Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 08/04/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s. Jewel Power Tools, Shaji J.K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Keerthi Raj regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Mookambika Juice Palace regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s VIBGYOR regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreereshmi C R, Remadevi P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won