Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.580/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs Keerthi Raj regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-11
Duration
approximately-5 years 7 months
Case Code No.
580
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank has filed a suit against Keerthi Raj for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount of ₹2,81,325/- due to non-repayment. The court delivered its judgment in favor of the plaintiff bank as the defendant did not appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the due amount along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹2,81,325/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the due amount along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff proved the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff proved the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹2,81,325/- is due from the defendant. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendant is liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹2,81,325/- (Rupees Two lakhs Eighty-One thousand Three Hundred and Twenty-Five only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Keerthi Raj
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o Raj Mohan Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application form for loans to Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), Original Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation, Original Letter of Undertaking regarding Loans/Advances, Bank statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Prasanth.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹2,81,325/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and her assets.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹2,81,325/- (Rupees Two lakhs Eighty-One thousand Three Hundred and Twenty-Five only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and her assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and her assets.
Evidence:
(b) The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original loan application form for loans to Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) dated 04/01/2020 signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking regarding loans/advances
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original Letter of Undertaking regarding loans/advances dated 04/01/2020 signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The bank statement of the loan account of the defendant for the period from 13/06/2010 to 13/06/2023 certified under the Bankers' Books Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 01/04/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s. Jewel Power Tools, Shaji J.K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Mookambika Juice Palace regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s VIBGYOR regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs D. Hari Krishnan et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreereshmi C R, Remadevi P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won