Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.454/2023

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s. Jewel Power Tools, Shaji J.K regarding realization of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-12-15
Duration
Case Code No.
454
Case Closed
Mon, 12/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the Bank of Baroda seeking to recover a loan amount from M/s. Jewel Power Tools and its proprietor Shaji J.K. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite being notified.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest. The defendants were found liable for failing to repay the loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. 2,43,250/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest. The defendants were found liable for failing to repay the loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence supporting their claim for the loan recovery.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence supporting their claim for the loan recovery.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence prove its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. 2,43,250/- to the plaintiff jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Jewel Power Tools
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaji J.K
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, Sanction letter, DPN, letter of Sole Proprietorship, letter of Installment with Acceleration clause, Composite Hypothecation Agreement, Declaration cum undertaking.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Smt.Nazia Sharaf
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is decreed with costs and defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. 2,43,250/- to the plaintiff jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application submitted by the defendants for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sanction letter acknowledging the loan granted to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of Demand Promissory Note executed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of Sole Proprietorship
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentation establishing the defendants' sole proprietorship.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of installment with acceleration clause
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement detailing the repayment schedule and conditions.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement securing the loan against collateral.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Declaration Cum Undertaking Cum Authority
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal document affirming the terms of the loan and the authority given to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Financial statement showing the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of the legal notice sent to the defendants for repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal receipts confirming sending of legal notices.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Returned Legal Notices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents indicating the returned status of the legal notices sent.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 08/29/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Keerthi Raj regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Mookambika Juice Palace regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s VIBGYOR regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs D. Hari Krishnan et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreereshmi C R, Remadevi P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won