Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.409/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s VIBGYOR regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-02-18
Duration
approximately-9 years 3 months
Case Code No.
409
Case Closed
Tue, 02/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against M/s VIBGYOR for the realization of an outstanding loan amount of Rs. 3,42,954/-. The defendant did not respond to the court proceedings, resulting in an ex parte decision.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 3,42,954/- along with future interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay an amount of Rs. 3,42,954/- with future interest at the rate of 12.20% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 3,42,954/- along with future interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proves its case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proves its case.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the plaintiff is entitled to realise the amount from the defendant with future interest.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. Rs.3,42,954/- (Rupees Three lakhs Forty Two thousand Nine hundred and Fifty Four only) to the plaintiff with future interest at the rate of 12.20% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s VIBGYOR
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application, Composite Hypothecation Agreement, Copy of Statement of Account with Certificate.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Amount of Rs.3,42,954/- to be paid to the plaintiff with future interest.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed with costs and defendants shall pay an amount of Rs. Rs.3,42,954/- (Rupees Three lakhs Forty Two thousand Nine hundred and Fifty Four only) to the plaintiff with future interest at the rate of 12.20% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application dated 26.10.2015 showing the request for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement executed by the defendant agreeing to repay the loan amount with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the statement of account dated 10.02.2023 showing the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 10/26/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s. Jewel Power Tools, Shaji J.K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Keerthi Raj regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Mookambika Juice Palace regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs D. Hari Krishnan et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreereshmi C R, Remadevi P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won