Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.322/2020

Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Chithra et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S, Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-11-28
Duration
approximately-9 years
Case Code No.
322
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited, filed a suit against the defendants for the amount due from a loan sanctioned for purchasing a stitching machine. Despite repeated demands, the defendants failed to repay the loan amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of ₹70,031/- with interest and costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹70,031/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and the costs of this suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of ₹70,031/- with interest and costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence adduced on behalf of the plaintiff remains unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence adduced on behalf of the plaintiff remains unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
The documents produced by the plaintiff clearly demonstrate that defendants 1 to 3 are liable to pay the said amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹70,031/- (Rupees Seventy Thousand and Thirty-one only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants 1 to 3 and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chithra
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Harikrishnan. R
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramesh
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of the former Power of Attorney, Original Demand Promissory Note, Original Agreement of Hire Purchase, Original revival letter, Statement of account from 31/10/2016 to 28/10/2019, Copy of the lawyer’s notice, Postal receipts evidencing the dispatch, Original returned unserved notices, Certified copy of the Power of Attorney.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Jayarekha G.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ganesh P.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount due.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹70,031/- (Rupees Seventy Thousand and Thirty-one only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants 1 to 3 and their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants 1 to 3 and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of the former Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the authority of the representative of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the loan agreement and the debt owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original agreement of Higher Purchase
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the terms under which the loan was given.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original revival letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the loan agreement was revived and thus confirms the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of formal communication regarding the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms dispatch of the lawyer's notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7 series
Document Type: Original returned unserved notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates failure to serve the defendants with the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8 series
Document Type: Certified Copy of Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of the plaintiff's representation in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Recovery of Money
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 10/31/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won