Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.188/2020

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
approximately-8 years 2 months
Case Code No.
188
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. filed a suit against Santha and others for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs.61,914. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite receiving notice.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover Rs.61,914 along with 6% interest from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of Rs.61,914 with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till date of realisation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover Rs.61,914 along with 6% interest from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Supporting Evidence
PW1 filed affidavit in lieu of chief examination and he reiterated the contents in the plaint and the same remains unchallenged and unrebutted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs allowing the plaintiff to recover an amount of Rs.61,914 (Rupees Sixty One Thousand Nine Hundred and Fourteen only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till date of realisation from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vineeth.V.S
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Unnikuttan
Party Age
19
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lalu
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of Power Of Attorney, Demand Promissory Note, Original Hire Purchase agreement, Revival letter, Statement of account, Advocate Notice, Postal Receipt (Nos.3), Returned unserved Notice(Nos.3)
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ganesh.P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Jayarekha.G.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is liable to be decreed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the authority of the plaintiff's representative in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This note was critical in proving the defendants' obligation to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Hire Purchase agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement detailed the terms under which the loan was granted.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter indicated the renewal or reaffirmation of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement provided evidence of the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice served as a formal request for repayment to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts confirmed the sending of notices to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7 series
Document Type: Returned unserved Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents were evidence of the notices that were not delivered to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 11/02/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Remya.S et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won