Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1613/2018

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
approximately-9 years 3 months
Case Code No.
1613
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank seeking the repayment of a loan amount of ₹58,270/- from the defendants, Shibu.V and Krishnapanicker, who defaulted on their loan payments. The defendants were set ex parte due to their absence in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to realise ₹58,270/- along with interest and costs from the defendants. The defendants failed to appear in court and did not contest the claims.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹58,270/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to realise ₹58,270/- along with interest and costs from the defendants. The defendants failed to appear in court and did not contest the claims.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff bank was unchallenged due to the defendants being set ex parte, showing that the defendants owed the claimed amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff bank was unchallenged due to the defendants being set ex parte, showing that the defendants owed the claimed amount.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to realise ₹58,270/- with interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests from the date of suit till realisation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹58,270/- from the defendants and their assets. 2. Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests from 15/10/2015 till the date of decree. 3. Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu.V
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnapanicker
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Original Pronote, Take Delivery Letter to DPN, Agreement for MSME Working Capital Limits – CC and OD, Request for Overdraft Facilities, Loan Sanction Communication to Borrowers, Statement of Account, Copy of Advocate Notice, Copy of Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. S.Reena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹58,270/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to realise ₹58,270/- with interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests from the date of suit till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 15.5% from 15/10/2015 till the date of decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 15.5% per annum with monthly rests from 15/10/2015 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendants for availing the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the defendants' promise to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of loan by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement detailing terms of the loan facilities.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the defendants' request for overdraft.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Loan Sanction communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Official communication sanctioning the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement showing the defendants' loan position.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawyer notice sent to the defendants demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Copy of postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for the postal communication sent to defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card acknowledging the communication sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 10/15/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Abilash.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won