Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1315/2020

Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-29
Duration
approximately-5 years 2 months
Case Code No.
1315
Case Closed
Wed, 01/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Federal Bank Ltd, is seeking to recover an educational loan amount from the defendants, who have failed to repay despite repeated demands. The case was heard ex-parte due to the defendants not filing a written statement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, Federal Bank Ltd, allowing for the recovery of the total outstanding loan amount plus interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,56,245.64 with 6% interest from the date of the suit until realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, Federal Bank Ltd, allowing for the recovery of the total outstanding loan amount plus interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the outstanding loan amount due from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the outstanding loan amount due from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of 2,56,245.64/- ₹ (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty-Six Thousand Two Hundred Forty-Five and Sixty-Four paise only) is due from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 2,56,245.64/- ₹ (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty-Six Thousand Two Hundred Forty-Five and Sixty-Four paise only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Federal Bank Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rohil. V
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venugopal. R
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayamma. S
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, Sanction letter, Loan agreement, Demand promissory note, Security delivery letter, Revival letters, Statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sandeep T. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ajith. G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Baiju Gopinathan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 2,56,245.64/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty-Six Thousand Two Hundred Forty-Five and Sixty-Four paise only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendants as part of the loan process.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the approval of the loan amount by the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the terms of the loan agreement executed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a promise to pay the loan amount with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Security Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document that provides security for the loan provided.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the outstanding loan amount as of a specific date.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further acknowledges the balance due on the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of the statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides the details of the outstanding balance on the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 11/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Abilash.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won