Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.145/2022

Case between Sandhya G.R vs Bindu G.R regarding partition of property

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Code No.
145
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sandhya G.R, and the defendant, Bindu G.R, are sisters involved in a partition suit regarding properties inherited from their deceased parents. The plaintiff claims her right to a share in the properties, which the defendant contests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing partition of the properties and granting both the plaintiff and defendant equal shares.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule properties by metes and bounds.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing partition of the properties and granting both the plaintiff and defendant equal shares.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff demonstrated her entitlement to a share in the inherited properties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that the case of the plaintiff for partition of the plaint schedule properties stands proved by the evidence of PW1 and the documents marked from her side.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) A preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule properties by metes and bounds is granted. (b) The plaintiff and the defendant are entitled to get 1/2 shares each over the plaint schedule properties.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sandhya G.R
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindu G.R
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Death Certificate of Sri. Raveendran. P, Death Certificate of Smt. Girija. S, Certified copy of the Sale deed No.1753/87, Encumbrance certificate, Tax receipt, Certified copy of the Partition deed No. 873/2000
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajaprathap S.J.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kiran. P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Vijayakumaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Renju C.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Abhilash. N
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Hashmi. V.Z
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Akhila Aji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule properties by metes and bounds.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: (a) A preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule properties by metes and bounds is granted.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Both parties entitled to 1/2 shares over the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
The plaintiff and the defendant are entitled to get 1/2 shares each over the plaint schedule properties.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to be put in separate possession of her share.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to be put in separate possession of her share demarcated in the final decree and to fix the boundary of the same.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant entitled to be put in separate possession of her share upon payment of requisite court fee.
Evidence:
The defendant is entitled to be put in separate possession of her share upon payment of requisite court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Death Certificate of Sri. Raveendran. P.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Death Certificate of Smt. Girija. S.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Sale deed No.1753/87.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Encumbrance certificate.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt for the said property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Partition deed No. 873/2000.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt for the said property.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 09/11/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won