Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1429 /2019

Case between Sheeja V.J vs Asha regarding rejection of plaint

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-28
Duration
Case Code No.
1429
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sheeja V.J is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Asha. The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of a remitted court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled that the plaint is rejected due to the lack of a court fee payment.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the plaint is rejected due to the lack of a court fee payment.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to remit the necessary court fee and did not file an application.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to remit the necessary court fee and did not file an application.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that no balance court fee seen remitted and no application filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 (c) Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheeja V.J
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asha
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.R. Maheshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Padmakumar V.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won