Case Summary
Vijayamohanan.A is the plaintiff, and D.K. Santhosh Kumar is the defendant in this case. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, and the case was ultimately dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not appear for the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
As plaintiff was absent and no representation was made on previous postings.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence no reason to proceed with this suit further. Hence Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vijayamohanan.A
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- D.K. Santhosh Kumar
- Party Age
- 60
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. L.Satheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Anand.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Visakh.V.V
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence no reason to proceed with this suit further. Hence Dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022