Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No.1133/2023 — Case between K. Prathap kumar et al vs Sheela regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.No.549/2025
Case between C.S.Sudhan vs Abraham Paul et al regarding injunction.
C.S.Sudhan, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from forcibly evicting him from his property. The court has granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.839/2021
Case between M/S EDS Structures Private Limited vs M/s Excalibur Group Private Ltd regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
M/S EDS Structures Private Limited is the plaintiff against M/s Excalibur Group Private Ltd and its Managing Director along with two other defendants regarding a dispute over a construction contract. The plaintiff claims that the defendants failed to make payments for services rendered as per an agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.273/2017
Case between K.P.Sanilkumar vs Kerala State et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
K.P.Sanilkumar filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding unlawful trespass and demolition of his property. The plaintiff claims ownership and seeks an injunction against further trespass.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.1274/2025
Case between Reghuthaman Nair vs Sindhu.K.V. et al regarding injunction
This case involves a petition for an injunction filed by Reghuthaman Nair against Sindhu.K.V. and Sreedhanya RS. The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's access to a building and constructing a boundary wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1144/2024
Case between Vinod T vs Biju B regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
Vinod T filed a suit against Biju B for permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is attempting to alienate property that he agreed to sell to the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1250/2023
Case between M.I. Shanavas Khan vs Ansar.H et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
M.I. Shanavas Khan is the plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction against Ansar.H and others, who are accused of unlawfully attempting to take possession of the plaintiff's property to construct a Dargah. The defendants threatened the plaintiff and attempted to trespass into the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.972/2025
Case between Dr. Yamuna Prasad vs PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Dr. Yamuna Prasad and Dr. Asha Prasad, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, the PRS Krishna Apartment and its Secretary, Sajith S. Pillai. The case involves a dispute over the operation of a clinic by the plaintiffs and the defendants' attempts to remove signage related to the clinic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1422/2025
Case between E. Asha Thomas Vayalil Kollattu et al vs Emmanuel .K. Thachedathu regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, E. Asha Thomas and Manju Sajan George, are siblings who have filed a suit against their brother Emmanuel .K. Thachedathu regarding their mother's property rights. The case involves concerns over the defendant allegedly attempting to alienate property belonging to their elderly mother, who is suffering from Alzheimer's disease.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1568/2025
Case between M.V. Pradeep kumar et al vs T.R. Bhagyalekshmi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, M.V. Pradeep kumar and V.M. Bindu, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, T.R. Bhagyalekshmi and others, regarding a sewage pipeline issue. The plaintiffs claim illegal connection of sewage lines causing potential blockage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1189/2024
Case between Praseed.T et al vs I P C SALOM SENAYEE CHURCH HALL et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, consisting of Praseed T, his wife Sobhakumari, and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are associated with a church hall. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants have been making loud noise from religious activities that disrupt their peaceful living.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 732/2025
Case between P.T. Thomas et al vs Satheesh Kumar regarding temporary injunction
P.T. Thomas and Lovely Mathew have filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction against Satheesh Kumar to prevent the destruction of a lateral support property. The petitioners claim that the property has existed as lateral support for more than 200 years and is crucial for the protection of their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1875/2025
Case between Thusar P S vs M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited et al regarding property dispute
Thusar P S is the plaintiff seeking a remedy against M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited and several directors regarding a property dispute. The court is considering a petition for security against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1511/2019
Case between Shyam Manohari V.S vs Geetha O regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
Shyam Manohari V.S, a widow and owner of a property, is involved in a legal dispute with her neighbor Geetha O, who is accused of making illegal constructions that violate building rules. Shyam seeks a permanent injunction against these constructions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1897/2025
Case between Dr.Cine Supriya V.R vs State of Kerala et al regarding temporary injunction against sewage line construction.
Dr.Cine Supriya V.R is the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants regarding the construction of a sewage line that allegedly encroaches on her property. The court considered the balance of convenience and irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 443/2023
Case between Remla Sahir vs Shaji.V regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Remla Sahir, filed a suit against the defendant, Shaji.V, for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges harassment and threats from the defendant regarding her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.127/2022
Case between Faisy (Abdul Faisy) vs Jaseera regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Faisy and Shahudeen are plaintiffs seeking a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction to protect their easement rights over a pathway. The defendant, Jaseera, is accused of attempting to obstruct access to this pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No. 315/2025
Case between Sharafudheen vs Nujumudheen regarding temporary injunction
The petitioner Sharafudheen is seeking a temporary injunction against his brother Nujumudheen to prevent him from encroaching on his property. The dispute arises over a pathway and allegations of unauthorized cutting of a new pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No. 343/ 2025
Case between S. Jessi vs Abdul Siyad regarding temporary injunction against encroachment.
S. Jessi is the petitioner seeking a temporary injunction to prevent Abdul Siyad and others from encroaching on her property. The case involves allegations of threats and attempts by the respondents to cut a new pathway through the petition schedule properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 288/2023
Case between Saju vs Varkala Municipality et al regarding granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
Saju is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Varkala Municipality and its officials, claiming they are attempting to illegally close down his hotel business. The case involves disputes over the operation of the hotel and alleged influence from the property's previous owner, Mr. Mohankumar.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 461/2023
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Chicago Constructions International Private Limited et al regarding temporary injunction for unauthorized construction
Suresh Kumar filed a petition against Chicago Constructions International Private Limited and its Managing Director S. Mohanakumar, seeking a temporary injunction to prevent further construction on a property and to remove an unauthorized construction. The case revolves around issues of property possession and encroachment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.188/2020
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. filed a suit against Santha and others for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs.61,914. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite receiving notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.338/2018
Case between Biji.R vs Sheeja regarding specific performance
Biji.R filed a suit against Sheeja for specific performance of a contract regarding the sale of a property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to execute the sale deed despite receiving an advance sale consideration.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.406/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Canara Bank is seeking to recover outstanding loans from Jyothish Kumar N. The defendant failed to appear in court to contest the claims made by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.423/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Civil Suit
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.471/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreereshmi C R, Remadevi P regarding realisation of money
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sreereshmi C R and Remadevi P for the recovery of an educational loan amounting to Rs.1,77,203. The defendants were absent and the case proceeded ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.504/2015
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
The plaintiff Ramesan seeks a partition of the ancestral property claimed jointly with the defendants, who are siblings. The case arises from disputes over the joint possession and ownership of property following the death of their mother.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.598/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding Power of Attorney
The case involves the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and various defendants from the Indian Pentecostal Church of God regarding the acceptance of a power of attorney. The plaintiffs challenge the validity of the power of attorney executed by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.718/2020
Case between Beatrice Miranda vs Sheela Tommy et al regarding violation of injunction order
Beatrice Miranda filed a petition alleging that the respondents violated an injunction order preventing them from trespassing on her property. The court addressed the claims related to the pathway and constructed gate leading to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.745/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, seeks to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendant group Ayodhya Kudumbasree, which has defaulted on repayments. The case involves multiple members of the self-help group represented by their officials.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.834/2023
Case between Jyothishmathi vs Krishna Kumar regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Jyothishmathi, has filed a suit against the defendant, Krishna Kumar, for the realization of a loan amount of Rs.5,00,000/- borrowed by the defendant. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite being notified and placed ex-parte in the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1349/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit and its members for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests and notices sent by the bank.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1475/2022
Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Bindu, is the owner of a building from which she has attempted to evict a tenant due to non-payment of rent. The defendant, Jayakumar, allegedly attempted to trespass into the property, prompting the lawsuit for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1613/2018
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank seeking the repayment of a loan amount of ₹58,270/- from the defendants, Shibu.V and Krishnapanicker, who defaulted on their loan payments. The defendants were set ex parte due to their absence in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won