Similar Cases
Based on: EA.No.345/2025 — Case between Lakshimi R. Nair vs Karunaikumar C.M et al regarding eviction proceedings.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
EA.No. 217/2025
Case between Pattom Service Cooperative bank Ltd vs Shajira regarding execution application.
This case involves Pattom Service Cooperative bank Ltd as the decree holder and Shajira as the judgment debtor. The court heard the execution application and passed an order regarding a previous attachment.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
EA.No.2/2025
Case between Alex J Lopez et al vs Tessy Roy regarding obstruction in execution proceedings
The case involves Alex J Lopez's legal heirs as plaintiffs and Tessy Roy as the defendant regarding an obstruction petition in execution proceedings related to a prior decree. The plaintiffs are seeking to enforce a court order, but the defendant has filed an obstruction petition claiming rights to the property.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
EA.No.1/2025
Case between Kazhakkuttam Service Co-operative bank Limited vs Prasad M.L regarding Execution of Attachment
Kazhakkuttam Service Co-operative Bank Limited is the decree holder, while Prasad M.L is the judgment debtor in this execution application regarding the attachment petition. The court has allowed the execution application and vacated the previous order of attachment.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
EA.No.212/2025
Case between Shijin Jose et al vs Asha Prakash et al regarding execution application
The case involves a petition by Shijin Jose and Jose for the return of articles taken into custody during a previous execution order. The court has permitted the return of these articles under specific conditions.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 1898/2019
Case between Krishnan kutti vs Manikantan regarding execution of money decree
This case involves Krishnan kutti, the judgment debtor, and Manikantan, the decree holder, concerning an execution application related to the sale of property for the recovery of a money decree. The judgment debtor seeks to adjourn the sale, claiming non-compliance by the decree holder.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.No. 1184/2008
Case between Jalaja et al vs Jayanthi et al regarding Execution application
This case involves Jalaja and others as petitioners who are decree holders against Jayanthi and others, the judgment debtors. The court allowed the execution application and directed the appointment of an advocate commissioner.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1221/2019
Case between Kesavankutty Nair. J vs Leena Mohanan et al regarding Execution Application
The petitioner, Kesavankutty Nair. J, seeks a stay on an order related to an execution application. The defendants are Leena Mohanan and Mohanan, who are the decree holders in this matter.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.No.1709/1991
Case between Suresh.R.K et al vs Sethukutty Amma et al regarding Execution Application
The case involves Suresh.R.K and Radhakrishnan Nair as petitioners/judgment debtors, and Sethukutty Amma, T.R.Rajeev Kumar, and others as decree holders/judgment debtors. The dispute arises from an execution application regarding a mediation settlement that has not been fully complied with.
Execution Application
OS.1197/2009
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs V.Shailaja Kumari et al regarding execution of a decree
The case involves the Branch Manager of Canara Bank seeking execution of a decree against V.Shailaja Kumari and A.B.Mohanakumar. The execution petition was dismissed due to lack of action by the decree holder despite repeated directions.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.565/2008
Case between Baby Padmam et al vs Dodwell.C et al regarding Implementation of Judgment Debtor
This case involves the petitioners, Baby Padmam and Sherin B Das, who are the decree holders. They filed an application to implead the legal representatives of the deceased first judgment debtor, Dodwell.C.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.342/2015
Case between Krishnan Kutty Nair vs Vincent.G regarding execution application for property demarcation.
Krishnan Kutty Nair filed an execution application seeking to ascertain and demarcate a property. Vincent.G is the counter petitioner with no objections filed.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 2588/2014
Case between V.Suresh Kumar vs G.Unnikrishnan regarding setting aside sale in execution proceedings.
V.Suresh Kumar, the judgment debtor, filed an application to set aside a sale conducted by the court wherein G.Unnikrishnan is the decree holder. The application contended that there were irregularities in the auction proceedings.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS 1738/2005
Case between Director of Health Services vs Sreekantan regarding garnishee application
This case involves a petition filed by the Director of Health Services as a garnishee regarding the attachment of salary and benefits due to the deceased Anil Kumar. The court examined the claims and objections raised regarding the garnishee's role and the proper handling of the deceased's financial entitlements.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.301/2009
Case between Jayagopan Nair vs Krishnapillai regarding Execution Application
Jayagopan Nair is the petitioner or decree holder in this execution application, while Krishnapillai is the counter petitioner or judgment debtor. The case involves the release of a specified amount from the judgment debtor's account to the decree holder.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1383/2021
Case between S. Sanalkumar vs Chevron Bulders & Relators(P) Ltd et al regarding Execution of Decree
S. Sanalkumar is the decree holder seeking execution of a decree against Chevron Builders & Relators (P) Ltd and its managing director, Jose Thomas. The court allowed the application for discovery of assets necessary for execution.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.524/1978
Case between M.Divakaran et al vs Gouri Parvathy et al regarding Execution application
The case involves M.Divakaran and his family as petitioners against Gouri Parvathy and other judgment debtors regarding an execution application. The court dismissed the execution application for default due to the absence of the petitioners.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
Original Suit 493/2018
Case between Sreenivasan vs Shibu.S. regarding execution of decree
Sreenivasan, the petitioner and decree holder, is executing a petition against Shibu.S., the judgment debtor. The execution petition was finally heard and allowed by the court.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
EA.No.811/2023
Case between Vellanad Service Co-operative bank Limited 2379, Secretary,Vellanad Service Co-operative Bank Limited 2379, Sasidharan Nair et al vs Manager, Real Industrial Corporation regarding execution petition.
Vellanad Service Co-operative bank Limited and others are petitioners challenging the maintainability of an execution petition filed by the Manager of Real Industrial Corporation. The petitioners argue that the execution petition is not maintainable as the jurisdiction of the court is being contested.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EA.No.557/2023
Case between Dr.S.Rajalekshmi vs Vellanad Service Co-operative bank Limited et al regarding execution of delivery of savings boxes.
Dr.S.Rajalekshmi filed a petition as the decree holder against Vellanad Service Co-operative bank Limited and others for the delivery of 1,750 savings boxes. The petitioner sought court intervention to ensure compliance with a prior order regarding these deliveries, which had been outstanding since 1996.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
EA.No. 92/2025
Case between Arumukham Pillai vs Nalini Harikumar regarding setting aside an exparte order.
This case involves Arumukham Pillai as the petitioner and Nalini Harikumar as the counter petitioner. The court heard the petition to set aside an exparte order against the judgment debtor.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
EA.No. 91/2025
Case between Arumukham Pillai vs Nalini Harikumar regarding execution petition
Arumukham Pillai is the judgment debtor and Nalini Harikumar is the decree holder in this execution petition case. The court has heard arguments from both parties before making a ruling.
Execution Petition
EA.No.464/2024
Case between Rakesh vs Sarath Babu et al regarding execution petition
Rakesh filed a claim petition against Sarath Babu and others, seeking to prevent his eviction from a rented premise. He contends that he was not aware of the ongoing eviction proceedings and relies on the shop for his livelihood.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
O.S.No.6628/2016
Case between Jacob Mathew et al vs Share wealth Chitts Ltd regarding execution of decree
Jacob Mathew and Ambily T Chacko are the decree holders seeking execution against Share wealth Chitts Ltd. The case concerns the legal permissibility of simultaneous execution of a decree from different courts.
Execution Application
Plaintiff Won
OS No.175/2017
Case between Kochurani vs Shainu Claire Mathews et al regarding stay of execution proceedings
Kochurani, the petitioner, seeks to stay the execution of a decree for which she is a judgment debtor. She claims residential rights based on an order from a maintenance tribunal but the court finds that there are no grounds to stay the execution.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
E.P. No.07/2020 in os. No.56/2018
Case between Lochan Varghese vs Annamma Thomas @ Chinnamma et al regarding Execution application
Lochan Varghese filed an execution application against Annamma Thomas @ Chinnamma and Shibu John. The court dismissed the execution petition for default.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
RCP.No.52/2022
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
R.Vijayakumar filed a petition against Arun Mohan regarding non-compliance with a previous court order related to a rental property. The court ordered Arun Mohan to put R.Vijayakumar in possession of the building.
Rent Control Petition
Plaintiff Won
R.C.P.No.60/2024
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
Ashraf Ali filed a rent control petition against Badhusha. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Rent Control Petition
Defendant Won
O.P (Pauper) 01/2022
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
The case involves Sreedevi as the plaintiff seeking money from Mahesh, the defendant. The application was filed for the realization of money, and Sreedevi claimed to be unable to pay court fees.
Application in Pauper Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.183/2025
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
Anitha Kumari.L.K and her children are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Madhu.S and Gangadevi. The case involves restraining the defendants from making constructions in certain properties until a specified date.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.423/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Civil Suit
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.598/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding Power of Attorney
The case involves the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and various defendants from the Indian Pentecostal Church of God regarding the acceptance of a power of attorney. The plaintiffs challenge the validity of the power of attorney executed by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.718/2020
Case between Beatrice Miranda vs Sheela Tommy et al regarding violation of injunction order
Beatrice Miranda filed a petition alleging that the respondents violated an injunction order preventing them from trespassing on her property. The court addressed the claims related to the pathway and constructed gate leading to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1475/2022
Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Bindu, is the owner of a building from which she has attempted to evict a tenant due to non-payment of rent. The defendant, Jayakumar, allegedly attempted to trespass into the property, prompting the lawsuit for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1940/2013
Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Subaida et al regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession.
The case involves the plaintiffs seeking a mandatory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants regarding certain shop rooms and a residential building. The additional second plaintiff, who is the son of the first plaintiff, claims the defendants have been occupying the premises without proper rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won