Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EA.No.464/2024

Case between Rakesh vs Sarath Babu et al regarding execution petition

Court
Court of Principal Munsiff, Thiruvananthapuram
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S.
Order Date
2025-03-12
Duration
approximately-6 months
Case Code No.
464
Case Closed
Wed, 03/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rakesh filed a claim petition against Sarath Babu and others, seeking to prevent his eviction from a rented premise. He contends that he was not aware of the ongoing eviction proceedings and relies on the shop for his livelihood.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed Rakesh's petition for being not maintainable. The dismissal was based on the existing eviction order against the original tenants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed Rakesh's petition for being not maintainable. The dismissal was based on the existing eviction order against the original tenants.
Key Reasoning:
The claim petition was found to be not maintainable as the order of eviction against the original tenants is binding on all sub-tenants.
Why Defendant Won:
The claim petition was found to be not maintainable as the order of eviction against the original tenants is binding on all sub-tenants.
Supporting Evidence
The court agrees that the petitioner cannot be evicted unless the original tenants are legally evicted, for which there is already a binding order.

Judgment Evidence:

In this result; The petition is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rakesh
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarath Babu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madhu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geetha D
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Nellimoodu Udayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Nair Ajay Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Robin Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The petition is dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence, this court is of the view that the present petition is not maintainable and is only liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EA.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 09/05/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arumukham Pillai vs Nalini Harikumar regarding execution petition
Court of Principal Munsiff
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between Arumukham Pillai vs Nalini Harikumar regarding setting aside an exparte order.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vellanad Service Co-operative bank Limited 2379, Secretary,Vellanad Service Co-operative Bank Limited 2379, Sasidharan Nair et al vs Manager, Real Industrial Corporation regarding execution petition.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Dr.S.Rajalekshmi vs Vellanad Service Co-operative bank Limited et al regarding execution of delivery of savings boxes.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vivek.S vs Meenambika regarding delivery of vacant possession.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won