Similar Cases
Based on: O.S. No.1247/2022 — Case between Sunil Kupperi vs Leela regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S. No.472/2018
Case between P.C. Samuel vs S. Xavier regarding arrears of rent and damages
P.C. Samuel, the plaintiff, rented out a building to S. Xavier, the defendant, for running a hotel. The plaintiff claimed arrears of rent and damages due to the defendant's non-payment and alleged damage to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 90/2022
Case between Ayyappan vs Ivin Prabhu et al regarding eviction from property
Ayyappan, the petitioner, claims to be the statutory tenant of a property he uses for his scrap business. The defendants assert they purchased the property at auction and are seeking to evict him.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.776/2020
Case between The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited vs Radhika Devi. A.L regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent.
The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited filed a suit against Radhika Devi. A.L for eviction and recovery of rent arrears. The defendant was accused of failing to pay the increased rent and execute a new rent deed after the agreement expired in 2017.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1900/2022
Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom et al vs Abdul Rahim@ S. Rahim regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, a Devaswom, seeks to recover dues from the defendant, a businessman, for unpaid rent. The defendant has remained in the premises beyond the agreed lease term without paying the necessary increased rent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1428/2024
Case between K.B. Ajikumar vs Prem Rishikumaran regarding unlawful eviction
K.B. Ajikumar, the plaintiff, seeks to prevent Prem Rishikumaran, the defendant, from unlawfully evicting him from the rented building where he operates his office. The dispute arises from alleged rental arrears and the conditions surrounding a rent agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.884/2020
Case between The Kerala State Fedaration of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Development Co-operative Ltd No.4351 vs A.S Girish regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent
The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operative Ltd filed a suit against A.S Girish for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent due to non-payment. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to the case being heard ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 458/2023
Case between Azeem Aboobaker Sait vs Leelakumari regarding arrears of rent and eviction
Azeem Aboobaker Sait, represented by his power of attorney holder Ashokan K, filed a petition against Leelakumari for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent. The respondent has not paid the rent due since January 2022, leading to the suit seeking a direction for deposit of the owed amount.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
R.C.P.No.36/2025
Case between Padma Sadasivan vs Soumya Chakkungal Simon regarding eviction and arrears of rent
Padma Sadasivan filed a petition against Soumya Chakkungal Simon for eviction due to non-payment of rent amounting to Rs.6,60,000. The court found that the counter petitioner defaulted in rent payment after September 2022 and allowed the eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.309/2025
Case between Aswathy Razak M vs Habsiba regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Aswathy Razak M and Baby Latha Razak, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Habsiba and Samuel Dev. The case revolves around the eviction attempts by the defendants and obstruction of water facilities in the rented properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.743/2025
Case between Asha.S. et al vs Asokan.G et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Asha.S and Ajithkumar, and the defendants, Asokan.G and others, concerning a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs are seeking to restrain the defendants from trespassing on their properties and obstructing their access to a pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1606/2024
Case between Maheen Abubacker vs D.Ambika Devi et al regarding eviction and rent agreement dispute.
The case involves Maheen Abubacker, the plaintiff, who entered a rent agreement with the defendants for a business property but is facing eviction. The defendants claim the plaintiff has not paid the agreed rent and is occupying the premises illegally.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
R.C.P.No.78/2024
Case between RS Krishna Jyothi vs Sibi Augustin regarding eviction and non-payment of rent.
The petitioner, RS Krishna Jyothi, seeks eviction of the respondent, Sibi Augustin, for non-payment of rent. The respondent failed to pay rent and did not respond to the legal notice demanding payment or vacating the premises.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1951/2019
Case between University of Kerala vs The Managing Director, Kerala State Co-operative Federation for Fisherman Development Limited regarding mandatory injunction
The University of Kerala sought a mandatory injunction against the defendant, the Managing Director of Matsyafed, for vacating a stall on university property. The plaintiff claimed the defendant occupied the stall unlawfully after the expiry of their license agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.877/2017
Case between Mohanan.B vs James Fletcher regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Mohanan.B and his wife Amutha.P, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, James Fletcher, who attempted to evict them from a tea stall they have operated for years. The plaintiffs claim they have a lawful tenancy and have been paying rent regularly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.907/2020
Case between R. Aravind vs Shaini Vijay regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
R. Aravind, a tenant, is involved in a suit against his landlord, Shaini Vijay, over the wrongful demand for eviction from a rented shop room. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is making illegal demands and threatening eviction despite the plaintiff having no rent arrears.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1241/2022
Case between Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple vs R.Sukumaran Nair regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession
The plaintiff, Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple, is seeking a mandatory injunction to evict the defendant, R.Sukumaran Nair, from a shop room. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has occupied the shop without legal permission after the lease was terminated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1194/2025
Case between Venugopalan Nair K. vs A.M. Shanavas et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Venugopalan Nair K. filed a suit against A.M. Shanavas and others for a temporary prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing on his property. The defendants are tenants of the plaintiff and have been accused of misusing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.147/2023
Case between Mohammed Sali vs Mammen Solomon regarding striking off pleadings and injunction.
Mohammed Sali and Mammen Solomon are involved in a case where the plaintiff, Mohammed Sali, failed to comply with a court order regarding the deposit of rent arrears. As a result, the court has dismissed the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.259/2019
Case between M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited et al vs George Mathew et al regarding forceful eviction
The plaintiffs, M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited and Geetha George, filed a suit against the defendants George Mathew and Mathew Fernandez for forceful eviction. The court determined that the suit was infructuous as the defendant had already obtained possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 114/ 2018
Case between Abdhulkalam vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Abdhulkalam, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents, Pallickal Grama panachayath and its Secretary, to prevent eviction from his shop room. The respondents argue the petition is barred by limitation and have filed an objection to the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.100/2023
Case between Shaji Sreedharan vs Niyas Shukkoor et al regarding eviction and arrears of rent.
Shaji Sreedharan is the plaintiff seeking eviction of the defendants from a shop room and recovery of arrears of rent. The defendants, Niyas Shukkoor and Noushad, have failed to pay rent since the tenancy was terminated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 172/2021
Case between Subash vs Nalini regarding eviction and damages.
Subash and Anil, brothers and plaintiffs, are seeking to evict the defendant Nalini from a shop room and recover damages for unpaid rent. The defendant has failed to vacate despite the expiry of the rental agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.188/2020
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. filed a suit against Santha and others for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs.61,914. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite receiving notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.338/2018
Case between Biji.R vs Sheeja regarding specific performance
Biji.R filed a suit against Sheeja for specific performance of a contract regarding the sale of a property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to execute the sale deed despite receiving an advance sale consideration.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.406/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Canara Bank is seeking to recover outstanding loans from Jyothish Kumar N. The defendant failed to appear in court to contest the claims made by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.423/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Civil Suit
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.471/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Sreereshmi C R, Remadevi P regarding realisation of money
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sreereshmi C R and Remadevi P for the recovery of an educational loan amounting to Rs.1,77,203. The defendants were absent and the case proceeded ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.504/2015
Case between Ramesan vs Sujatha et al regarding partition of ancestral property.
The plaintiff Ramesan seeks a partition of the ancestral property claimed jointly with the defendants, who are siblings. The case arises from disputes over the joint possession and ownership of property following the death of their mother.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.598/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding Power of Attorney
The case involves the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and various defendants from the Indian Pentecostal Church of God regarding the acceptance of a power of attorney. The plaintiffs challenge the validity of the power of attorney executed by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.718/2020
Case between Beatrice Miranda vs Sheela Tommy et al regarding violation of injunction order
Beatrice Miranda filed a petition alleging that the respondents violated an injunction order preventing them from trespassing on her property. The court addressed the claims related to the pathway and constructed gate leading to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.745/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, seeks to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendant group Ayodhya Kudumbasree, which has defaulted on repayments. The case involves multiple members of the self-help group represented by their officials.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.834/2023
Case between Jyothishmathi vs Krishna Kumar regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Jyothishmathi, has filed a suit against the defendant, Krishna Kumar, for the realization of a loan amount of Rs.5,00,000/- borrowed by the defendant. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite being notified and placed ex-parte in the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1295/2023
Case between Aravindan Nair et al vs Ramachandran Nair et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are siblings, sought a partition of property from the defendants, also siblings, after the death of their sister. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were obstructing their rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1349/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit and its members for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests and notices sent by the bank.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won