Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 114/ 2018

Case between Abdhulkalam vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-06-20
Duration
approximately-7 years 4 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Abdhulkalam, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents, Pallickal Grama panachayath and its Secretary, to prevent eviction from his shop room. The respondents argue the petition is barred by limitation and have filed an objection to the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition to accept the witness schedule and issue summons to the Panchayath Secretary was dismissed. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to accept the witness schedule and issue summons to the Panchayath Secretary was dismissed. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs.
Key Reasoning:
The court held that a party cannot compel an opposite party to produce documents or to appear as a witness for their own case.
Why Defendant Won:
The court held that a party cannot compel an opposite party to produce documents or to appear as a witness for their own case.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that a party to a suit can't compel his opposite party to appear and adduce evidence as a witness for his/her own behalf.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdhulkalam
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pallickal Grama panachayath
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary, Pallickal, Grama panchayath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajaprathap. S.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Ramees Beevi. A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioner requested to accept the witness schedule and issue summons to the Panchayath Secretary of Pallikkal Grama Panchayath.
Evidence:
Here the court is of the view that a party to a suit can't compel his opposite party to appear and adduce evidence as a witness for his/her own behalf.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Costs to be awarded between the parties.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the petition, both parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Eviction from property
Case Code
Case between Abdhulkalam vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdhulkalam vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Fri, 02/16/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Panchayat

Similar Cases

Case between Chandrahasan et al vs The Secretary, Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Athira vs Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M.G. Siva prasad vs Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath et al regarding Balance Court Fee
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon vs Cheranellor Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won