Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 113/ 2018

Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-06-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shibily is the plaintiff seeking to declare a notice as null and void while also requesting to accept a witness schedule for examining the Panchayath Secretary. The defendants argue that the petition is barred by limitation and that the documents are not available.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition on the grounds that the plaintiff cannot compel a defendant to appear as a witness for their own case. Both parties are directed to bear their own costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition on the grounds that the plaintiff cannot compel a defendant to appear as a witness for their own case. Both parties are directed to bear their own costs.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner cannot compel the defendants to appear as witnesses for their own evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner cannot compel the defendants to appear as witnesses for their own evidence.
Supporting Evidence
A party to a suit can't compel his opposite party to appear and adduce evidence as a witness for his/her own behalf.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shibily
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pallickal Grama panachayath
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary, Pallickal, Gramapanchayath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.S. Faizi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Ramees Beevi. A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner requested to accept the witness schedule and issue summons to the Panchayath Secretary.
Evidence:
this court is of the view that a party to a suit can't compel his opposite party to appear and adduce evidence as a witness for his/her own behalf.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Reliefs and costs were considered.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the petition, both parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Barred by limitation
Case Code
Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.
Case Code Year
Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Panchayat

Similar Cases

Case between Chandrahasan et al vs The Secretary, Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Abdhulkalam vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Athira vs Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M.G. Siva prasad vs Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath et al regarding Balance Court Fee
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won