Case Summary
M.G. Siva prasad filed a suit against the Secretary of Chenkal Grama Panchayath and others regarding the remittance of balance court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the balance court fee. Therefore, the court dismissed the case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Plaint rejected, u/o 7 R 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.G. Siva prasad
- Relation
- Managing partner
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Secretary, Government of Kerala
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chief Secretary, Government of Kerala
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.Anil Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Anoop Krishna.B.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to absence of plaintiff and no balance court fee remitted.
Evidence:
Hence Plaint rejected, u/o 7 R 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.G. Siva prasad vs Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath et al regarding Balance Court Fee
Case Code Year
Case between M.G. Siva prasad vs Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath et al regarding Balance Court Fee