Similar Cases
Based on: OS NO. 114/ 2018 — Case between Abdhulkalam vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS NO. 113/ 2018
Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.
Shibily is the plaintiff seeking to declare a notice as null and void while also requesting to accept a witness schedule for examining the Panchayath Secretary. The defendants argue that the petition is barred by limitation and that the documents are not available.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 107/2018
Case between Chandrahasan et al vs The Secretary, Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves multiple plaintiffs led by Chandrahasan against the Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath and its committee members. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 922/2021
Case between Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon vs Cheranellor Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Lalithamma Radhakrishna Menon and her daughter Smitha Radhakrishna Menon, are seeking permanent prohibitory injunction against the Cheranellor Grama Panchayath, claiming that the Grama Panchayath has no authority to maintain a pathway they co-own. The Grama Panchayath contends that the pathway is public and they have the right to maintain it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1783/2022
Case between M.G. Siva prasad vs Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath et al regarding Balance Court Fee
M.G. Siva prasad filed a suit against the Secretary of Chenkal Grama Panchayath and others regarding the remittance of balance court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.432/2020
Case between Athira vs Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat et al regarding dismissal of suit
Athira, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat and its officials. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.100/2023
Case between Shaji Sreedharan vs Niyas Shukkoor et al regarding eviction and arrears of rent.
Shaji Sreedharan is the plaintiff seeking eviction of the defendants from a shop room and recovery of arrears of rent. The defendants, Niyas Shukkoor and Noushad, have failed to pay rent since the tenancy was terminated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 172/2021
Case between Subash vs Nalini regarding eviction and damages.
Subash and Anil, brothers and plaintiffs, are seeking to evict the defendant Nalini from a shop room and recover damages for unpaid rent. The defendant has failed to vacate despite the expiry of the rental agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.472/2018
Case between P.C. Samuel vs S. Xavier regarding arrears of rent and damages
P.C. Samuel, the plaintiff, rented out a building to S. Xavier, the defendant, for running a hotel. The plaintiff claimed arrears of rent and damages due to the defendant's non-payment and alleged damage to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1247/2022
Case between Sunil Kupperi vs Leela regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Sunil Kupperi is the plaintiff claiming ownership of a property while Leela, the defendant, was a maid in the household. Sunil is seeking an order to vacate the premises as Leela has failed to leave despite requests.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 90/2022
Case between Ayyappan vs Ivin Prabhu et al regarding eviction from property
Ayyappan, the petitioner, claims to be the statutory tenant of a property he uses for his scrap business. The defendants assert they purchased the property at auction and are seeking to evict him.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.776/2020
Case between The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited vs Radhika Devi. A.L regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent.
The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited filed a suit against Radhika Devi. A.L for eviction and recovery of rent arrears. The defendant was accused of failing to pay the increased rent and execute a new rent deed after the agreement expired in 2017.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1900/2022
Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom et al vs Abdul Rahim@ S. Rahim regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, a Devaswom, seeks to recover dues from the defendant, a businessman, for unpaid rent. The defendant has remained in the premises beyond the agreed lease term without paying the necessary increased rent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1428/2024
Case between K.B. Ajikumar vs Prem Rishikumaran regarding unlawful eviction
K.B. Ajikumar, the plaintiff, seeks to prevent Prem Rishikumaran, the defendant, from unlawfully evicting him from the rented building where he operates his office. The dispute arises from alleged rental arrears and the conditions surrounding a rent agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.884/2020
Case between The Kerala State Fedaration of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Development Co-operative Ltd No.4351 vs A.S Girish regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent
The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operative Ltd filed a suit against A.S Girish for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent due to non-payment. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to the case being heard ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 458/2023
Case between Azeem Aboobaker Sait vs Leelakumari regarding arrears of rent and eviction
Azeem Aboobaker Sait, represented by his power of attorney holder Ashokan K, filed a petition against Leelakumari for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent. The respondent has not paid the rent due since January 2022, leading to the suit seeking a direction for deposit of the owed amount.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
R.C.P.No.36/2025
Case between Padma Sadasivan vs Soumya Chakkungal Simon regarding eviction and arrears of rent
Padma Sadasivan filed a petition against Soumya Chakkungal Simon for eviction due to non-payment of rent amounting to Rs.6,60,000. The court found that the counter petitioner defaulted in rent payment after September 2022 and allowed the eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.309/2025
Case between Aswathy Razak M vs Habsiba regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Aswathy Razak M and Baby Latha Razak, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Habsiba and Samuel Dev. The case revolves around the eviction attempts by the defendants and obstruction of water facilities in the rented properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.743/2025
Case between Asha.S. et al vs Asokan.G et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Asha.S and Ajithkumar, and the defendants, Asokan.G and others, concerning a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs are seeking to restrain the defendants from trespassing on their properties and obstructing their access to a pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1606/2024
Case between Maheen Abubacker vs D.Ambika Devi et al regarding eviction and rent agreement dispute.
The case involves Maheen Abubacker, the plaintiff, who entered a rent agreement with the defendants for a business property but is facing eviction. The defendants claim the plaintiff has not paid the agreed rent and is occupying the premises illegally.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
R.C.P.No.78/2024
Case between RS Krishna Jyothi vs Sibi Augustin regarding eviction and non-payment of rent.
The petitioner, RS Krishna Jyothi, seeks eviction of the respondent, Sibi Augustin, for non-payment of rent. The respondent failed to pay rent and did not respond to the legal notice demanding payment or vacating the premises.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1951/2019
Case between University of Kerala vs The Managing Director, Kerala State Co-operative Federation for Fisherman Development Limited regarding mandatory injunction
The University of Kerala sought a mandatory injunction against the defendant, the Managing Director of Matsyafed, for vacating a stall on university property. The plaintiff claimed the defendant occupied the stall unlawfully after the expiry of their license agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.877/2017
Case between Mohanan.B vs James Fletcher regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Mohanan.B and his wife Amutha.P, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, James Fletcher, who attempted to evict them from a tea stall they have operated for years. The plaintiffs claim they have a lawful tenancy and have been paying rent regularly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.907/2020
Case between R. Aravind vs Shaini Vijay regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
R. Aravind, a tenant, is involved in a suit against his landlord, Shaini Vijay, over the wrongful demand for eviction from a rented shop room. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is making illegal demands and threatening eviction despite the plaintiff having no rent arrears.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1241/2022
Case between Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple vs R.Sukumaran Nair regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession
The plaintiff, Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple, is seeking a mandatory injunction to evict the defendant, R.Sukumaran Nair, from a shop room. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has occupied the shop without legal permission after the lease was terminated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1194/2025
Case between Venugopalan Nair K. vs A.M. Shanavas et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Venugopalan Nair K. filed a suit against A.M. Shanavas and others for a temporary prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing on his property. The defendants are tenants of the plaintiff and have been accused of misusing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.147/2023
Case between Mohammed Sali vs Mammen Solomon regarding striking off pleadings and injunction.
Mohammed Sali and Mammen Solomon are involved in a case where the plaintiff, Mohammed Sali, failed to comply with a court order regarding the deposit of rent arrears. As a result, the court has dismissed the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.259/2019
Case between M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited et al vs George Mathew et al regarding forceful eviction
The plaintiffs, M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited and Geetha George, filed a suit against the defendants George Mathew and Mathew Fernandez for forceful eviction. The court determined that the suit was infructuous as the defendant had already obtained possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 268 OF 2016
Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves plaintiffs Ismail, Najmudheen, Kunhalavi Haji, and Anwar Sadath suing defendants G. Surendran, Abdul Salm, Abdul Gafoor, and Sekkeena for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings, leading to the case being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No.427/2017
Case between Rev. Fr. K George Jacob vs Vengola Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Rev. Fr. K George Jacob filed a suit against Vengola Grama Panchayath for a mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the Panchayath obstructed the natural flow of rainwater, causing flooding in his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 314/2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Mohammed Faisal and his wife Shejinamol seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction obstructing their access to a public road. Plaintiffs claim ownership and access rights to their property, while the Panchayath argues it holds valid authority to construct an Anganvadi on the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 300 /2019
Case between Mr. John Peter vs Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mr. John Peter filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat and others. The matter was settled in mediation, and the terms were accepted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 314 /2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding interim injunction
The case involves petitioners Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol seeking an interim injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction on the northern side of their property. The court found the petition barred by res judicata as a similar matter had previously been decided.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 314 /2 021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding approved building plan
The petitioners, Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol, are seeking relief concerning the construction of a building. The respondent is the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 08 / 2024
Case between Shaji Varghese et al vs Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat et al regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Shaji Varghese and Baby, seek a temporary injunction against the defendants, which include Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat and Ajimon.K.M, to prevent them from trespassing on their property and demolishing a compound wall. The dispute centers on the ownership and boundaries of several plots of land.
Civil Suit
O.S.No.51/2022
Case between Sreethu P N vs George P M et al regarding temporary injunction for use of a road.
Sreethu P N filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from blocking a local road that has been in use for 50 years. The defendants are accused of obstructing access to the road, affecting the plaintiff's ability to reach their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 344/2011
Case between Saji Hussain et al vs Edava Special Grade Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Saji Hussain and Hussain are the plaintiffs, while Edava Special Grade Panchayath and additional defendants include state authorities. The case involves a suit that was dismissed based on a not pressed memo filed by the plaintiffs.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.20/2023
Case between Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd vs The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath regarding realization of an amount due
Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd is the plaintiff seeking to recover an amount due from The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case involved a claim presented under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.462/2021
Case between Kadeeja vs Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction
Kadeeja is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property that the Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath has converted into a public road. The plaintiff seeks an injunction to remove the construction on her property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 24/2024
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
Babu Rajan N. and Raveendran Pillai are suing the Government of Kerala for a declaration of civil death of their brother, Mr. Rajendran N., who has been missing for 28 years. They require this declaration to facilitate obtaining a legal heirship certificate to pledge their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.41/2025
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
Sheena, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Anvar and Ramabhadran to stop an illegal chicken stall operating in a shop room owned by Ramabhadran. The plaintiff alleges threats and illegal constructions facilitated by Anvar.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 117/2021
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
The case involves The Federal Bank, Ltd represented by its Manager against defendants Siyad. S and Haseena Beevi. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
The petitioners, children of the deceased Solomon Cruz, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property purchased by their father, while the defendants claim rights over a portion of the property. The case involves disputes over property tax and land boundaries.
Civil Suit
OS NO. 273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and possession
The plaintiffs, Margaret Solomon Cruz and others, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property that they claim to be rightfully theirs. The defendants, Mabel James and others, contest this claim, stating that the property has been rightfully assigned to them.
Civil Suit
OS No. 361/2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
Sunitha, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant, to prevent alleged encroachment on her property. The dispute arises from a badminton court construction agreement and ownership claims over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 361/ 2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction
Sunitha, the plaintiff, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant. The case involves a dispute over property rights and the construction of a badminton court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 43/2025
Case between Nithin Krishna vs Gireesh et al regarding suit dismissal
Nithin Krishna is the plaintiff, and Gireesh along with others are the defendants in this case. The plaintiff filed a memo of not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 229/22021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The plaintiffs, Ayisha Beevi and her son Navas, are seeking to prevent the defendants, Noushad and Shajahan, from alienating a property. The court has issued an interim order to maintain the status quo until a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 219/ 2024
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Resmi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against her father Sureshkumar and his siblings, who are allegedly trying to alienate property against her father's interest. The petitioner claims her father is vulnerable due to his health conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won