Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 344/2011

Case between Saji Hussain et al vs Edava Special Grade Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2025-02-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Saji Hussain and Hussain are the plaintiffs, while Edava Special Grade Panchayath and additional defendants include state authorities. The case involves a suit that was dismissed based on a not pressed memo filed by the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit based on a not pressed memo filed by the plaintiffs. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit based on a not pressed memo filed by the plaintiffs. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saji Hussain
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hussain
Party Age
62
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Edava Special Grade Panchayath
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary, Edava Special Grade Panchayath
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala Coastal Zone Management Authority
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala Coastal zone Management Authority and District Level Committee
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Safeerkutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Rajendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Pradeesh Raj R.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Learned counsel of the plaintiff filed not pressed memo. Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saji Hussain et al vs Edava Special Grade Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Saji Hussain et al vs Edava Special Grade Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Panchayat

Similar Cases

Case between Chandrahasan et al vs The Secretary, Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won