Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.259/2019

Case between M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited et al vs George Mathew et al regarding forceful eviction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited and Geetha George, filed a suit against the defendants George Mathew and Mathew Fernandez for forceful eviction. The court determined that the suit was infructuous as the defendant had already obtained possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as infructuous because the defendant had already obtained possession of the property. The plaintiffs' request for forceful eviction was thus denied.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as infructuous because the defendant had already obtained possession of the property. The plaintiffs' request for forceful eviction was thus denied.
Key Reasoning:
The defendant had already obtained possession of the property through a prior execution petition.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
As Defendant has already obtained Possession of Plaint Schedule Property through Execution Petition in Execution Petition 397/2024 in RCP 23/2019 this suit filed against Defendant for forceful eviction is infructuous.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed as Infructuous.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha George
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Mathew
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathew Fernandez
Party Age
79
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B.S.Prasad Gandhi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Punchakkary G.Raveendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's suit for forceful eviction of the defendant from the property was dismissed.
Evidence:
this suit filed against Defendant for forceful eviction is infructuous. Hence suit dismissed as Infructuous.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited et al vs George Mathew et al regarding forceful eviction
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Spencer’s Travel Services Limited et al vs George Mathew et al regarding forceful eviction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom et al vs Abdul Rahim@ S. Rahim regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited vs Radhika Devi. A.L regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayyappan vs Ivin Prabhu et al regarding eviction from property
THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunil Kupperi vs Leela regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.C. Samuel vs S. Xavier regarding arrears of rent and damages
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won