Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1900/2022

Case between Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom et al vs Abdul Rahim@ S. Rahim regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-14
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Code No.
1900
Case Closed
Fri, 03/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, a Devaswom, seeks to recover dues from the defendant, a businessman, for unpaid rent. The defendant has remained in the premises beyond the agreed lease term without paying the necessary increased rent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of an amount due along with interest. The defendant is ordered to pay the costs of the suit as well.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
₹4,35,810/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of an amount due along with interest. The defendant is ordered to pay the costs of the suit as well.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence and documents presented by the plaintiff supported the claim for the recovery of dues.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence and documents presented by the plaintiff supported the claim for the recovery of dues.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹4,35,810/- remains due from the defendant. There is no evidence on record indicating that the defendant has discharged his liability to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹4,35,810/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Thirty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Ten only) remains due with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alappuzha Anantha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devaswom
Relation
represented by its President and Now represented by the Power of Attorney Holder V. Santhoshkumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Rahim@ S. Rahim
Party Age
46
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of the Power of Attorney, 5 Legal Notices dated 05/02/2022, Reply notice dated 09/02/2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G.S. Sanal Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Bijulal.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹4,35,810/- with interest.
Evidence:
Hence, the above point is answered accordingly. In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹4,35,810/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Thirty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Ten only) remains due with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the power of attorney was submitted by the plaintiff to support their claims.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Five notices dated 05/02/2022 were submitted to show that the lease was terminated and rent arrears were demanded.
Reference:
Ext.A2 to Ext.A6
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply notice sent by the defendant acknowledging receipt of the termination notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 11/14/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Devaswom

Similar Cases

Case between Maheen Abubacker vs D.Ambika Devi et al regarding eviction and rent agreement dispute.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.B. Ajikumar vs Prem Rishikumaran regarding unlawful eviction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Kerala State Federation of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development Co-operatives Limited vs Radhika Devi. A.L regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayyappan vs Ivin Prabhu et al regarding eviction from property
THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.C. Samuel vs S. Xavier regarding arrears of rent and damages
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won